Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (559342)	4/7/2010 8:42:11 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577836

lol All of his posts should end in....."...urp, hiccup..."

To: Brumar89 who wrote (559342)	4/7/2010 9:14:34 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577836

OH, there are several other reasons: 1. Iraq has a lot more oil than everyone else including possibly Saudi Arabia.. 2. They were an easy target and couldn't defend themselves. 3. Iraq is a great place to run a war....flat dessert great for tanks...Iraq had no air force... 4. It gave Jr. an opportunity to avenge the attempt on 43's life.. 5. It was easy to make the public believe that Saddam was a key player in 9/11 6. There were no WMD's......UN inspectors told us that as recently as 2 weeks before we invaded...