Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (16394)	4/8/2010 10:34:30 AM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

The top 25 hedge fund managers averaged over 1 billion dollars each in income last year.....and they pay capital gains rates... And this is significant in the context of dozens or hundreds of trillions of dollars of promises future spending because??? Lets say your reported facts are true. The 2011 long term capital gains rate is 20%. Lets say you bring the tax they pay up to 40%. Lets say the average is $2bil a piece. 20%$2bil25 is only $12.5 bil a year. And that's before considering the actions they take in response to this tax. If your going to tax their income more, than instead of creating the quasi-capital gains that they take, they will just transfer the income to real capital gains, they will get a piece of the operation and sell it later. So your back to 20% Well than you can raise the capital gains rate. Now you got them, they have to pay 40%. Well maybe not these people are rather sophisticated and will probably find some way to reduce their tax burden. But assume they can't, and that their activity doesn't change in any way. Fine you got your $12.5 bil a year, at the expense of generally discouraging and distorting investment across an economy more than a thousand times that size. Which isn't to say you can't get money by raising taxes even if you avoid such foolish raises as raising capital gains taxes to 40%, but your talking small potatoes compared to projected future spending. The problem isn't just that taxes don't meet the spending, the problem is the spending is too high. Having government at all levels spend 70+% of the GDP in the US, if it ever happens, is going to be hugely negative whatever tax changes you make.