Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (559555)	4/8/2010 3:47:49 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578214

"easy target" "couldn't defend themselves" - have you looked at Canada? We have no reason to invade Canada.... "great place to run a war" Its on the other side of the world. Accessible through a narrow shallow gulf. "flat desert" LOL Who cares what shape their desserts are? The military loved the battle terrain... "no air force" They had a big air force till we destroyed it. BS....what they had left after the first Gulf war was sent to Iran...they would have had no chance. "attempt on 43's life" Isn't trying to kill a US President an act of war? Trying? Absolutely not..... "player in 911" - Bush and Cheney explicitly said he wasn't. BS.....Bush interchanged the words Saddam and 9-11 very freely and convinced 70% Saddam was responsible for 9-11. "no WMD's" - everyone else thought so. Kennedy and Kerry warned they'd use them against us if we invaded. And of course, there's the fact that Iraq had USED WMD's before against both Iran and Kurds. Same old, same old......Bush and everyone was informed by Hans Blix in 5 (?) reports including 2 weeks before the invasion that Iraq had no WMD.. And besides that, having WMD is no reason to invade... N Korea has nukes, why no invasion?