Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (358676)	4/9/2010 5:53:32 PM
From: FJB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793931

RE:The White House is furious over the withdrawal Boo hoo. Waaahhh. I am cracking myself up imagining the temper tantrum. If you act the way the Obama regime has been acting, it is hard see how they could be surprised.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (358676)	4/9/2010 10:33:07 PM
From: skinowski	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793931

2. At the end of their stormy conversation in the White House, Obama handed Netanyahu a list of 11 issues on which he asked Jerusalem to respond. The prime minister continues to withhold his replies having been convinced from close study of the issues/queries that they were clever formulations designed to trick him into endorsing the new American plan for the Middle East BHO tried to catch BN in a web of verbal puzzles? LOL! Truly, some of those Harvard lawyers are not as smart as advertized. One down side of all this silly obamista circus is that Israel may be pushed towards Russia and China. That may help Israel in the shorter term, but may cause serious long term mistrust between them and the US.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (358676)	4/10/2010 3:55:33 AM
From: KLP	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793931

The arrogance of Obama is mindnumbing! If he's so intent on negotiating with both countries for a good resolution, why would he even dream he could listen to one side, and just hammer and be drop-dead rude to the other? If Obama were in the place of the Israeli PM, and Netanyahu were in O's place, would Obama just knuckle under to whatever the US said with NO thought at all for the people of Israel? Or for the actual peace in the region? Obviously, he thinks he can negotiate with a terrorist-led country that is Iran, and that they can be trusted. In addition, he might ask himself just when anyone from the Palestinian side of the issue has shown they were trustworthy on anything... One senior source said the leaked reports were serious because "President Obama has his mind set on getting the borders of Israel and the future Palestinian state negotiated and settled in four months. This process leaves no room for any discussion on the security frontiers promised Israel for decades, yet the US president expects the Netanyahu government to accept Washington's borders-cum-Palestinian state package without demur. His planners have shaped a Palestinian state within borders that make no provision for Israeli security. That is something the Netanyahu government will never accept."