Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (29016)	4/12/2010 12:27:32 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

WRONG... there's a birth certificate issued at birth with all the birth info in it, including the name of the delivering physician and the hospital, and so on... then there's the generic certificate of birth which only shows that the person was actually born... obumble only produced the latter, not the real birth certificate, it doesn't have to be the original but it has to be real, not the generic fraud he produced... There are two very different documents... 1) The Birth Certificate, and 2) The Certificate of Birth This is not just a play on words, these are two very different things... obumble has never produced the first item... so what if both are legal, no one ever questioned if he was born, the issue is WHERE WAS HE BORN? And this is what he's hiding... GZ