SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (16693)4/12/2010 12:16:20 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 42652
 
You'd need to flesh it out more for me, on the surface it doesn't sound fair to tax the basics at the same rate for wildly different income levels.



To: Sdgla who wrote (16693)4/12/2010 1:11:33 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 42652
 
How about 0% for all under a million... Consumption tax for all, then 15% on top of that for the mega earners.

I think this country would go bankrupt in a few months. In fact I doubt you could balance the budget if you taxed all of the earners over one million 100%.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News