Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Alternative energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7842)	4/15/2010 12:36:08 AM
From: Sam	Respond to of 16955

Interesting essays on FSLR--to short it or not to short it: Message 26462647

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7842)	4/15/2010 2:03:26 AM
From: Eric	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

So, margins will fall, and balance sheets will worsen, until the weak are allowed to die, and capacity gets shut down. That's how it works in the memory chip market, and that's how it's going to be in solar. As long as companies like LDK can do successful secondary offerings, the sector hasn't hit bottom. That has been my feeling for the last two and a half years. The "deep pocket" boys will survive. Personally a lot of the Chinese ones will fold with the amount of debt that they are carrying. PV's are almost commodities.. But.. we are getting or have achieved grid parity in a number of markets. That will only get better going forward. Conventional generating costs are climbing. And PV system costs are falling and will continue to fall for many years. Intersection...

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7842)	4/15/2010 8:46:18 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

Solar Investing Rule #3: After the IPO stage, a viable business plan must include internal funding of capex. If companies increase shares and debt every time they need capital for adding capacity, they will get to a point where all additional profits are diluted away, or go toward interest payments. During good times, for the economy and industry, these weaknesses may not be apparent. But, when an industry downturn happens, or credit conditions tighten, companies dependent on external financing will fail. The failure will be quick and spectacular, but the warning signs were there for years. Rule #4: Until one technology is clearly superior, it is best to reduce risk by investing in the best company in each technology. The solar industry is still immature, so nobody knows whether crystalline silicon, or CaTe, or amorphous Si, or CIGS, or some other thin film, or something I haven't heard about yet, will emerge as the superior technology. This industry immaturity is shown, by the fact that different companies dominate each year. In 2010, the Chinese c-Si companies are aggressively grabbing market share. Before that, it was First Solar, with CaTe. Before that, it was Q-cells and Sunpower. In 2014, the alt-energy industry will probably be dominated by a company in Zimbabwe, using viruses to grab electrons from zinc-porphyrin molecules: inhabitat.com Contrast solar instability with wind-power (relative) stability: Suzlon today has more than 50% of the India wind-power market. It has had 50% market share or better, every year for the last 10 years. It's a safe bet, that Suzlon will still dominate it's home-country market, next year, and the year after. It's also a safe bet, that companies like GE and Siemens and Vestas will still be in the top-10 rankings, and making profits in windpower, next year, and 5 years from now. There is no solar company that has a track record like that, of long-term dominance. Wind is a more mature industry than solar, and safer to invest in, today.