SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (2443)4/14/2010 12:03:53 PM
From: Grandk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 222249
 
About a month ago, stag had a sentiment reading of 98% bear/2% bull in NG. UNG still dropped down another 15% or so. Regardless, I think you are right. UNG is bottoming. Personally, I was hoping to see it in the 6.60 range but it looks like it might be ready to break out today.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (2443)4/14/2010 12:08:09 PM
From: giddy guru  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 222249
 
Nat gas may be bottoming. But UNG, the ETF has its own problems. Like USO , this can't back up the price with physical inventory. But GLD does that and so its very highly correlated to gold price. UNG primarily depend on future contracts and currently it is not helping that much.

Remember USO when IPOed the same price as crude. See where both of them today. So these ETFs are short term trading vehicle only. Don't stay too long

/gg



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (2443)4/14/2010 3:47:41 PM
From: robert b furman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 222249
 
Hi GZ,

there is a huge future and it is just beginning ot get serious recognition.

I agree,but do not have much experience in commodities.

What do you think the storing cost or rolling forward cost is on a contract?

Bob