Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (29270)	4/14/2010 5:09:02 PM
From: Cage Rattler	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

That seems like a legitimate theory / possibility... but only if the supply and demand for assets within the hierarchical group remain constant. Given a "free market" the price paid for those assets should correlate to the percentage of devaluation -- double the number of greenbacks and double the cost of any asset. However, I think it unwise to assume such static asset values. The trick (IMHO) is to pick the correct hard asset for investment the demand for which will rise against the tide. Perhaps this is the rational for investing in Au, Ag, etc., I happen to think so; but, then again, who knows?