Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (271)	4/14/2010 8:18:15 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

Some old facebook posts John Bordynuik(CEO) FB posts consolidated: siliconinvestor.com Posted by: stocker11 Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:15:16 PM In reply to: None Post # of 37624 Some old facebook posts John Bordynuik(CEO) FB posts consolidated: We can uplist to the AMEX if we can maintain $2/share for 20 days. We are moving fast. I am not waiting until march to assemble the BOD. Many people have contacted me about RRSP investments. Well, we had to start somewhere and the OTC was it. Now time to move up. I_really_ want, like, and believe the stock needs this. I've received some feedback from shareholders lately who believe JBI should engage some level of stock promotion to end "manipulation". I have reviewed a number of options: stock promoters and funds. They all do the same thing: pump and dump the stock, to the detriment of the new shareholders left wondering what happened. After reviewing many promoters and their backgrounds, we will not be engaging any of them. Funds are no better. Their methods aren't so visible but accomplish the same thing: sell (pump) their stock to clients. If certain shareholders want promotion, volume, etc... then they can pay for it. IMO, building real revenues and earnings are key to our stock price and volume. P2O will obviously drive it and end any MM games. You're witnessing something rare: a company's stock trading without a biased analyst BS'ing you and no stock promoters taking advantage of thousands of people. The company has no free trading shares to sell - its up to our shareholders to spread the word. Our trading pattern isn't odd.. it's what the market would look like without promoters, paid analysts or funds selling their stock to a song and dance. Big P2O works - it's a done deal. We needed a second set of eyes to validate the processor for mass rollout and safety (and bragging rights) which will allow us to promote P2O in the mainstream news. PakIt Traction product a huge hit! (no slip cleaner, polish, and finisher). Not slippery when dry OR wet - risk mitigation for slip and falls. Keep your eyes on PakIt! More P2O answers for JV's: We are locking up the supply agreements and will manage the source materials. We are providing the buyers for the outputs (grin) and ASTM testing. You run the processor - you are the operator. We'll manage what goes in and where it goes out. I am receiving some emails about scaling up P2O so I have been emailing this: Our large processor highly expands on our prototype machine. In order to handle tons of material over a 2 hour period, the function of each component in the prototype machine was expanded to multiple parts in the large machine. For example, in the small processor we have a water seal that acts as a condenser. In the large machine, this is accomplished with solids extraction tanks, condensers (plural), and eventually, a water seal. The hydrocarbon gas does not touch any water in our process until all of the carbon chains above C-5 have condensed into a liquid. We did not have to reinvent the wheel -- the back end of our processor is essentially a small refinery and has already been tested extensively. The key to our process is the catalyst. If you would like to see what a mess a plastic to oil system without a catalyst works like, have a view of the output product here: youtube.com . It is well known that any process running without a catalyst is either A) not efficient and therefore an investment gaff or B) highly subsidized or C) high polluter or D) all of the above. I'll post a picture of our fuel -- it isn't that black burnt garbage coming out of non-catalyst systems. Tires are _really_ easy.. Without giving away too much. The reactor has a beautiful ability to separate steel, carbon black powder, and the hydrocarbon gas automatically. Tires are very simple to process. Picture this: Tire enters reactor (chunks whatever), then after 8 hours or so the carbon back is sucked out, the wire in the liquid catalyst is then extracted by reversing the reactor. Very clean. I won't do tires at first. The yield is not as high as plastic. " Would they first be ground up and then fed into the reactor?" It would be very foolish of us to convert the entire tire into fuel. There is so much $$$ in a tire. How about converting the sidewalls of the tire into oil and preserve the elastomer in the treads and sell that at $0.84/pound? If I take that a bit further, why convert the sidewalls into $0.20/litre when I can skew the curve elsewhere and get $0.70? It's all about the hydrocarbon reforming. When you can crack a long hydrocarbon chain where you want it... then you can make more than those pumping aromatic hydrocarbons out of the ground... Another company we acquired in August 2009. This company has offices in Mexico so we can roll out our Plastic2Oil processors there. As well, we will use their communications expertise to ensure we are monitoring our P2O units anywhere in the world. A chemical company we own with a patent to encapsulate highly concentrated chemicals in water soluable packs. Very cool and inexpensive. Our product costs less than 50% of the competitors for the same or better performance. siliconinvestor.com

To: scion who wrote (271)	4/14/2010 10:36:12 PM
From: streetscraper	Respond to of 53574

I wonder what happen here. Is this a step back. This says gasoline range and now it's near diesel. Q&A Session for JBI Conference Call & Presentation Session number: 664952426 Date: Monday, November 23, 2009 Starting time: 2:34 PM important Webex has a 200 character limitation for Q&A so some were answered in the chat window. (from chat window): We currently have a back log of tapes, and have received new orders from Oil and Gas. "Do you expect the 3rd party validation of the P2O to be complete this year?" That is possible. Samples of fuels were created from various plastic feedstocks and were tested (ASTM D 5453) and confirmed a sulphur concentration less than 8.4 ppm (parts per million). Additionally the water and sediment tests (ASTM D 1796) confirm that its fuel contained less than 0.005% water and sediment. Density tests also placed the fuel in the gasoline range. "What is the estimated cost to produce 1 barrel of fuel in terms of just the operational costs?" This is difficult to answer as we are being paid to accept the feedstock, generate excess energy and sell the output. The cost is less than $10/barrel if we load up our business plan with costs. Thanks again all for connecting today and for your questions. We are obviously very excited about P2O and the large processor is our highest priority. We will inform everyone about its status when validation is complete. Yes, the processor will accept unwashed plastics. It will reverse from time to time to clean out anything that entered the system that is not plastic. Our tape reading objectives: We have expanded our tape business to become a full-service data migration company. We can now scan/read tapes,fiche,film, paper, optical media and carts as a one-stop shop for data migration. We then provide our clients with a solution to access their data (new and old) through a web interface. Our systems support IBM 7094 (1961), UNIVAC, through 180s systems to present. (cutoff) We currently have a huge backlog of tapes/carts to read >100k. Breakdown of Revenue: We did not break the statements out for a number of reasons. It is very difficult to acquire 3 entities in one quarter much less consolidate all of the information into a Q. In addition, a MD&A has to be prepared based on the information. As well, for every statement we submit in a Q, we must be prepared to answer questions from the SEC or other regulatory bodies. This is very expensive and very time consuming - our focus is to launch P2O at this time. We can back our statements but are still growing and do not have the internal infrastructure to dedicate to answering regulatory body questions in volume. (cutoff) Therefore, we will file information that provides detail about the company but not so much detail that we spend our days answering questions. Some companies receive in excess of hundreds of comments and it can take much time to scan in and compile documents to answer one question.