SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24469)11/5/1997 3:58:00 PM
From: Furry Otter  Respond to of 35569
 
No kidding...I doubt if a single gold exploration jr. would qualify for Vector Vest, since none of them have "earnings"

Regards, Otter



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24469)11/5/1997 4:15:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Larry, since we are considering using Vector Vest valuation, I felt it was time for doing real TA for IPMCF. I found an old coke bottle, not as old as EC, but old. I then marked the words "buy" and "sell" alternately around a circle. I had my wife spin the bottle (I wanted remove any bias if I did the spinning). The coke bottle gave a solid buy signal, twice. Those simple minded computer programs will never have the accuracy of a tried and true coke bottle test. That's due dilly!



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24469)11/5/1997 5:33:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Something we can agree on.

In general tech analysis works best long term on earning stocks
and should be avoided for explorers excepy where short term discovery is likely.

But pure tech IS an indicator.

It will not conclusively demostrate a fundamental, just whether that
fundamental is appreciated by the market.

But finally the market, right or wrong is the market. And tomorrow never knows.

EC<:-}