SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wade who wrote (17318)4/16/2010 12:17:51 AM
From: gold$10k  Respond to of 48092
 
If anyone else is having problems with CNBC's lousy data buffering, here it is on YouTube...

youtube.com



To: Wade who wrote (17318)4/16/2010 6:02:10 AM
From: TheSlowLane  Respond to of 48092
 
Thanks...

Ackerman:

"In this context, we should think of gold’s recent rally from 1086.10 to 1170.70, not as a mild failure, but as promising success. Although that assumption would be challenged by a severe selloff, as long as the futures hold above 1118.40 (i.e., a 0.618 retracement of the most recent rally cycle), we’ll stick with the assumption that a bullish surge to at least 1245 is imminent. We would assume the rally to be under way following a “booster-stage” thrust of at least $21 from any low above 1118.40."

kitco.com



To: Wade who wrote (17318)4/16/2010 9:21:04 AM
From: shakes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 48092
 
"Speaking from my own experience..." he says he's 40% PMs; 35% PM stocks; the remainder Oil/Gas and miscellaneous.

"...you might say we're all in..."

"...we really like silver...the above ground inventory is smaller than for gold..."

Striking how friendly Maria was with him, not contentious

regards,
Shakes