Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (403079)	4/16/2010 8:07:13 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

i got u faded on monday, i'm takin the yeller dog

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (403079)	4/16/2010 8:17:18 PM
From: Terry Maloney	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>>moron lawyers at sec were told, find something, and they picked the wrong fricken one.<< Tainting the evidence was probably more what they were really doing, imo.

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (403079)	4/17/2010 2:49:52 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 436258

Re GS. Perhaps the case by the SEC has just created a window so that more regulation of markets now ensues. The property market went way out of control years ago. independent.co.uk this thread was created in 2001 Subject 51347 and I thought a pull back was overdue at that time. Whatever, I can't see how this SEC news can be seen as bullish on Monday. Of course, the experience is, everything has been bullish!! -ng-