Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (136796)	4/17/2010 11:16:07 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543460

As far as I could tell (after reading the linked message in your post) the issue of stratosphere vs. troposhere was not a key to the legal and factual issue before the court--the factual issue was: Was CO2 harmful in a global warming sense. Are you saying you have to be a scientist to understand that issue? And if so, I have to say it's not the judges job to play scientist--they have to go by the evidentiary record in front of them. What side has the more weight.