Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (17079)	4/19/2010 5:25:43 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

OT It seems to me that, at a minimum, and in very, very simple terms, we can reduce our usage, increase our production, work towards shifting to fuels we can produce, trade more with friendlier places so we are less beholden and vulnerable to unfriendly places, and try to do what we can to make the unfriendly places friendly or, if not friendly, then hobbled. Which is what I meant when I wrote that there is not significant opposition. It would be really hard to object to that, seems to me. I really don't think that "energy independence" is used as strictly as you did by many people. I could be wrong. Like I wrote, I haven't paid a lot of attention to this.