SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (562131)4/21/2010 12:52:32 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575597
 
Foreclosures on houses in their territory are sky-high. This fall, I heard that they were repossessing cars that the foreclosed-upon were using for shelter. A lot of people where I grew up were living in their cars, and they were even losing that makeshift shelter, too. Out of idle curiosity a couple of weeks ago, I ventured onto Realtor.com, and ran a search for houses under $250,000. I saw oceanside condos on the list that were listed at prices I hadn't seen since the late 1980s. One penthouse condo was listed at about $245,000. A five bedroom, three bath house with pool and tennis court was listed well below $200,000. That should tell you how bad it is. The company that owned the bank, and that issued those shares, still exists, but everything that made that company what it was came from that bank. It might as well not exist any more, either.

I am still stunned by the failure of the FLA economy. I guess I am used to CA. On the surface, they both look the same.....good weather, growing fast, lots of tourism, etc. But apparently, CA has more substance behind it......CA is coming out of its mess but FLA is still neck deep in it.

One of the first notifications I got from the bank, after the estate settled -- and after I bought my house -- about the stock was that they were experiencing difficulties. They wrote, honestly and forthrightly, that they had invested in collateralized debt obligations. That, and the horrific damage that has occurred during the recession to the regional economy, sealed that institution's fate. What I do not know is whose CDOs they bought. I would like to find out that information, and I am not sure how to go about it. I have no idea where to even start.

Not true......the bank must disclose the info if asked.

I am not talking about protecting fat-cats. My mother wasn't one of those people, she didn't come from one of those families. She worked damned hard for many years in public education. My mother sank a great deal of money into that bank stock, starting in the early 1980s, buying a few shares once a month for years. She was a child of the Depression, and grew up a Southern Baptist minister's daughter in rural Georgia during the late 1920s and through the 1930s. She made this bank stock the centerpiece of her investment strategy because she believed with all her heart that this was the safest investment she could possibly make. Bear Sterns collapsed a couple of months before her estate closed. I just thank God fasting that she did not live long enough to have to rely on the sale of that stock to pay for her care (she had surgery for a brain tumor that did not go well, and the tumor grew back, killing her).

So many people here got wiped out by the collapse of WAMU. The Rs will not win on this issue.....bank reform must happen.

More, for all that I feared him, I wish my brother had had access to the funds a sale of healthy stock would have brought him. My brother could have used that money for health care. He died of lung cancer early this morning. For all the bitterness between us, as hideous a relationship as we had, I still wish he could have had the funds for medical care -- for you see, he had no health insurance and he was just a few years too young for Medicare. My sister-in-law is going to lose their home -- they haven't been able to pay the mortgage the last two months, because what money they did have went for the medical bills. She's now destitute and will probably drop the keys into the mail before she moves in with her siblings in another state.

His brother will get no sympathy......after all, he smoked. He deserved everything he got.....isn't that how the rhetoric goes?



To: SilentZ who wrote (562131)4/21/2010 1:31:06 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575597
 
* In the major parties' first quarter fundraising totals, both the DCCC and the DSCC outraised their Republican counterparts. The Democratic committees also have more cash on hand than the NRCC and NRSC.

* Meanwhile, National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) declared yesterday that making gains in this year's midterms isn't enough to constitute success. "Anything less" than a Republican majority, Sessions said, would mean he fell short of his "mission statement."



To: SilentZ who wrote (562131)4/21/2010 2:14:29 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575597
 
The Walled City Where Sunlight Couldn't Reach the lower levels



A dystopian megacity, in which buildings merge together to become a single solid block, is the stuff of science fiction — but it already happened, in Hong Kong. The Kowloon Walled City was packed so tightly, it became an arcology.

Kowloon Walled City arose out of a weird circumstance in the treaty between the Brits and the Chinese that created Hong Kong. China gave the New Territories to the Brits in 1898 but excluded the Walled City, which the Chinese wanted to be able to use as an outpost. The Walled City developed a kind of status as a no-man's land — but it was really only after the Japanese surrendered after World War II that the Walled City became totally ungoverned, with neither the Chinese nor the British exercising control.

The result was a tightly contained but fast-growing city, with buildings being added on top of each other and every inch of space being used. The Wikipedia page has some great stats, including the fact that the average apartment in the City was only 250 square feet, and there were 33,000 residents occupying the 6.5 acre region in 1987. The construction was so dense that sunlight didn't filter down to the lower levels, which were lit by fluorescent lights.



The city reached a uniform height of around 10 storeys but couldn't grow much higher, because it was so close to Kai Tak Airport. The whole thing was torn down in the early 1990s, and a park was built on the site — including a scale model of the Walled City.

io9.com