Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (3744)	4/21/2010 7:01:35 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

<The point of the multiverse idea is to deny that the universe and life are special. > IN your mind only. I posted an article whose theme was that the multiverse explained the universe's fine-tuning. <That science has a choice between a designer and a multiverse was the THEME of the article and was explicitly stated in it. > And that one comment out of an entire article somehow morphed into... EVERY PHYSICIST... No, you're making something up. I've made no claims about ALL physicists. All physicists btw do not subscribe to the multiverse concept. In fact, no one actually claims it to be a fact. But people are encouraged to believe in it though. you're a hypocrite again: claiming physicists aren't open to god and using a physicist that is open to god as evidence. Again, you lie about my position. Or you're too stupid to understand it. <Personally I'd use the word fantasies. > AS ALL science starts out. I guess I missed fantasizing as a scientific step. <BTW another example of this 'running from God' thing is Francis Crick's hypothesis that life was seeded on the early earth by extraterrestials (directed panspermia).> This sums up your "position": That was your reply? Another example you think YOU know how God works... yet you put forward NOTHING. You throw stones and belittle others ideas and sit on your fat ass and do nothing. I don't know "how God works". God is quite mysterious. I notice again you substitute anger and hysteria for argumntation.