SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : YellowLegalPad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John McCarthy who wrote (927)4/23/2010 7:11:09 PM
From: John McCarthy  Respond to of 1182
 
CMM

Victor Gonçalves: Finding the No-Brainers
Source: By Tim McLaughlin and Karen Roche of The Gold Report 04/23/2010

The Gold Report

TGR: Do you have any companies in mind that you see presenting these kinds of opportunities?

VG: Oh, absolutely.

The first one is a no-brainer and I love no-brainer stories.

No-brainer stories are great because you don't have to worry about them.

Century Mining Corp. (TSX.V:CMM) is one of those no-brainer stories.

Century Mining got really beat up for quite a while.

Then it turned around quite nicely for multiple reasons.

One reason is a Russian group bought 45% of the company to get the company into production. They got the money they needed to put their Lamaque Mine into production. It's not in production yet, but they're working on that right now.

What's interesting is the numbers.

Between their Peruvian operation and their Quebec operation, which is the Lamaque Mine, the company should be producing between 140,000 and 150,000 ounces of gold a year.

All-in costs should be around $460 an ounce.

So you're looking at a company that could be making in the order of $70 million or $80 million a year before taxes.

You factor a 10 or 12 multiple into that, which is quite low, and you could be looking at a stock price that is $2, $2.50 just for fair valuation.

The share price is currently at $.60. It's moved up a little bit in the past couple of weeks-month, but it's still very cheap.

That's a no-brainer.

TGR: Is Century Mining something you would hold on a long-term basis?

VG: I would and do have a core position on Century Mining.

The company has 6 million ounces of gold in all categories as it is now.

To date it's produced 9 million.

I think the blue-sky potential is multiple millions more.

That's certainly a company that can expand production.

It can potentially even start consolidating the Val D'or area just by default of having a stronger stock price and a lot of money in the bank.

Whether it is Century or some else like Agnico-Eagle Mines (TSX:AEM), I think that it is a likely scenario.

TGR: Any other no-brainers out there?

VG: There are companies that aren't necessarily absolute no-brainers that are still significantly interesting.

Kent Exploration Inc. (TSX.V:KEX; PK SHEETS:KXPLF) is one that is doing very good work and building shareholder value. They're trading around the $.20 range. We've talked about them in the past. They're separating their assets into two different companies to give Kent, and ultimately the new company, Archean Star, shareholders more value.

A lot of times you'll see companies have 10 properties in their portfolio and really one of them is getting value, maybe two. There are eight or nine others in the portfolio, so the way to unlock that value is to put them in a vehicle where they can get all the attention that's needed to build those new projects. Graeme O'Neill, the president of the company, saw that. Very quickly he decided that a spinning off of the Australian assets and the New Zealand assets into a new company was the best way to unlock value for the shareholders while maintaining the other properties in a vehicle that could be worked on. So Kent right now is at $.20. What they're doing with their spinoff is with every four shares you own of Kent you'll get one of Archean Star. You'll be able to participate in both stories just by owning one.

TGR: Victor, share price is typically calculated by ounces in the ground and progress toward production. Why does splitting it into two companies provide more value to the shareholder?

VG: Let's say you have a company and it's got four projects. Say the company has got 50 million shares that are trading at $.20. That gives you a $10 million market cap. Now let's say one project has 600,000 ounces. That project should be worth say, $8 or $9 million. Then you've got a bunch of other projects that are effectively worth $1 million. The market tends to value what you're working on now. The market doesn't look at the fact that you've got three other projects. They're looking at what can become tangible soon or reasonably soon. The only thing that's going to become tangible soon is what you're working on now. So what ends up happening is the stuff that's on the sidelines or in your portfolio ends up getting zero value. If you look at 50 companies in that situation, you'll find that probably 50 of them have the same problem.

The other reason is because, quite frankly, you're going to dilute your company to raise the money you need to work on all the projects. For example, to work on one project you need $3 million. If you want to work on say two projects you need $8 million. You've got to raise a lot more money so your share structure gets shot. The problem is all that work will not get reflected in the stock price. So the best way to do it is to get a new vehicle that can raise money for one particular project or a set of projects that can be the focus.

So what happens is you get Project X with a valuation on it and then you've got a small number shares with a higher nominal price. You can raise more money with a higher stock price, consequently issuing less paper. How you unlock shareholder value is the price of the shares has to be high to make it worth anything. The market capitalization can move higher and higher and higher, but if you're issuing shares at an even faster pace, dollars per share, or cents per share will go down long term. Even though the company's gotten more value, what you paid for your shares ends up going down. Spinning off the asset makes a lot more sense.

TGR: In January, gold was still around $1,000. We've gone up to $1,150. Where do you think gold is going as we head into the summer and through the rest of 2010?

VG: You're going to see technical moves one way or the other. You may see a drop to $1,000 and I wouldn't panic if that happens. You may see it run to $1,250, $1,300. I certainly wouldn't get overly excited if that happens, unless it holds there for a little while so it creates a new base. We're probably not going to see a strong gold market in the summer. That doesn't normally happen. So really we'll probably see more weakness going forward than strength.

That being said, the price of gold-based equities still has to catch up to $1,000 valuation of gold, let alone where we are now. So even if gold were to come off a little bit during the summer, gold equities still have to catch up to that valuation point before they can keep moving up. I think we're really going to see a move in gold when we saw it last year, around September. We might see a little strength here for the next month or so. We may hit $1,200. We may test $1,240 but it should come off after that during the summer. For really June, July and August it should see some weakness and that's normal. So I wouldn't be concerned.

Long term, at the end of 2011, $1,500 I think is fair. Now if we see a huge debacle in Europe, and let's say three or four countries start singing the same tune as Greece, then I'm suspecting we'll see the $1,500 level come a lot quicker.

TGR: What other junior mining companies do you see as a good value?

VG: Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. (NYSE:PZG;TSX:PZG) looks good. They're developing quite a strong asset, 2.6 million ounces of gold equivalent. That being said, I think that company will take a little longer to go anywhere. It's going to keep adding ounces. That's what that story is about; it's just an adding-ounce story. It gives the company an intrinsic value. As it develops more ounces, it will give the stock a higher and higher price or a better value for it. So I think a company like this, at the current level of $1.40, $1.50, should continue to do well. It's not going to start screaming up in price, but it's going to have a steady increase going forward. It's also going to get insulated against market activity a lot more because it has that intrinsic value. You can say these shares should be worth X because there's X amount of ounces of gold associated with it. So a company like that is going to fair quite a bit better against a company that still has to find their first or second ounce.

TGR: Anybody else in this category?

VG: Yes, we have Otis Gold Corp. (TSX:OOO) in that category as well. They've got ounces, and they've already shown about 700,000. They also have exploration that they're doing. So they have this intrinsic value from the current ounces they have. Plus they have the upside potential that you get when you're trying to prove up more ounces and that's what they're doing. Otis Gold, in the $.50 range, is actually quite inexpensive given the number of ounces they have, plus their exploration upside potential.

Let me talk about one more company in all of this. This one kind of goes against everything I just finished saying. We're talking about all these companies with ounces that are defined, companies that have an intrinsic value. Richfield Ventures Corp. (TSX.V:RVC) is entirely different in that regard. They don't have a resource defined yet. This is a discovery story. Richfield is in the process of finding and proving to us a new gold camp in British Columbia. There could be a lot of activity with that company this summer. They're going to be doing a 25,000-meter drill program to define what some people are calling 4 to 7 million ounces of gold, which is very significant. They're able to do this rather inexpensively, and they also have a lot of money in the bank to do it with. They'll be sitting on somewhere in the range of $15 to $16 million in cash right now if you consider all the warrants that are well in the money. This is a very interesting situation because they're in the process of proving now what I think will be a new gold camp. They entered the last hole they drilled last year that gave 1.25 g/t over 329 meters ending in 5 g/t over the last 9 meters. They recently announced that they have re-entered that hole and are planning to take that hole to over 700 meters. In that announcement they said that they were past the 500-meter mark and are still in the same rocks that they got in the first 329 meters. This will be a very exciting story, especially if they come up with the same spectacular results that they have been getting so far.

TGR: Very interesting, Victor. Thanks for spending time with us today.

A proud and avowed Keynesian, Victor Gonçalves developed a strong background in economics at the University of Winnipeg, where he served as a Professor's Assistant as well as earning his degree. His Equities and Economics Report has been accurately picking winners and calling market direction. In 2007, for instance, he correctly predicted the Dow Jones topping 14,000 points and pegged uranium reaching $136 per pound and many more. In addition to EER, Victor also produces the Green Dollar Report as well as writes for a number of print and electronic publications including CIM Magazine (Canadian Institute of Mining), Western Standard, Barron's and Kitco. He also has been featured on BNN, Mining Industry TV and at numerous industry events and conferences.

Want to read more exclusive Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Expert Insights page.

theaureport.com

CRACKER



To: John McCarthy who wrote (927)4/29/2010 1:33:28 PM
From: John McCarthy  Respond to of 1182
 
CMM - post by Production5

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
10) ``Upon commencement of gold production at the Lamaque gold mine, senior management will focus its energy on expanding production at Lamaque.``

Our Lamaque mill is officially capable of processing 3,000 tpd of high grade our.

At 95% recovery and 4.78 g/t grade, that`s 157,000 ounces of annual production.

No point wasting such capabilities with a $1,165 gold price available. If they have success with the new drill program (in moving more near-surface ounces into P&P) then I hope management will be able to implement a new mine plan to scale up from 105,000 ounces of production to 150,000 ounces within the next couple of years (prior to the shafts being ready).

If so, we could become a mid-tier gold producer just from organic growth alone, with 180,000 ounces of production (150K Lamaque and 30K San Juan).

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thoughts on today`s NR

1) ``is pleased to announce that the mill facility at its 100% owned Lamaque gold project located in Val-d'Or, Québec, Canada is fully operational``

I don`t get the impression that the market entirely appreciates the significance of that statement. In my view, this is a major hurdle/accomplishment. Even from a distance, I have observed countless number of start up mine operations experience either hard to locate (and correct) vibration problems or serious recovery issues or other processing problems. The companies that owned those particular start up operations either got severely crippled or were partly eaten by sharks.

2) ``is currently processing 900 to 1,100 tonnes per day of ore from current production and existing stockpiles``

A 900 - 1,100 tpd run rate represents production run rate of 47,000 to 57,000 ounces for Lamaque (assuming they hit the targeted 95% recovery rate and 4.76 g/t grade). I can only assume they did not go full out with 1,200 tpd because they want to ensure they can maintain that pace until Bedard Dyke ore mining comes online (and is ramped up to a reasonable level), otherwise I guess if they push the 1,200 tpd too early then they might use up too much of the stockpile and not be able to maintain these levels until BD arrives.

3) ``The executive team is extremely pleased with results to date at Lamaque, and we can now focus on reaching further milestones as we progress through 2010.``

This likely means that Finskiy and Scola are extremely pleased also. If the people with the most money invested (and with inside info) are please then that is likely a positive development for us small shareholders.

4) ``The Company currently has a workforce of 180 on site, including staff, union employees and general contractors. This workforce is focused on mine expansion, mill facility upgrades, site reclamation and monitoring and general site maintenance.``

The company had 115 employees at Lamaque at the beginning of April. They now have 180, once they include general contractors. I don`t think the difference of 65 is all contractors. My guess is they have made some good strides in April in hiring a good number of employee miners in anticipation of mining the Bedard Dyke.

Also, from the last couple of NRs, I get the impression that they seem to be partnering well with the Quebec government. Not only has the government purchased the 1M tonne waste rock from Century (for road building purposes) but Century seems to going strong (with them) in reclamation of the unused parts of the property and just making the pit area look more pleasing to drivings on the hwy.

5) ``The development crew underground continues to mine in three separate stoping complexes.``

This is positive, as they were about to get into the 3rd stoping area (in the last update). Still going strong with 3 stopes, it likely means the original stope (at the beginning of March) is still a strong ore provider.

6) ``The low profile underground mining equipment to be used to increase efficiencies and production in the Lamaque #2 zone is expected to arrive at the minesite within days and on schedule.``

Yes, on schedule, but would have nicer to get earlier in April though. It`s understanable as I think most of it is coming all the way from South Africa. Plus, we are still very fortunate to have our order filled so quickly after financing got closed off (especially with the mining business booming again).

7) ``The Company continues with its final mine planning for the Bedard Dyke and expects to collar the portal in the very near future.``

I don`t mind if the BD mine plan takes a bit longer to fine tune or implement. This is going to be an important mining area for the company in the future. Also, later on down the road they will need to put in the crown pillar to mine under the hwy and such, and to also initiative long-hole stope mining (which will be a big step for us, both efficiency wise and increased tonnage).

8) ``The Company is also now preparing to commence a 150,000 foot (45,000+ meter) exploration and definition drill program in May 2010 at Lamaque, and is expected to continue over a three-year period.``

I wouldn`t be surprised if the last 3 drill holes for BD gets released with launch of this new exploration program.

9) ``At its San Juan gold mine, the Company will be ramping up exploration efforts on specific targets to evaluate the large property position.``

It should be exciting to find out which targets they select at San Juan. You can see my post from a few weeks ago regards to tires they might want to briefly kick down in Peru.

10) ``Upon commencement of gold production at the Lamaque gold mine, senior management will focus its energy on expanding production at Lamaque.``

Our Lamaque mill is officially capable of processing 3,000 tpd of high grade our. At 95% recovery and 4.78 g/t grade, that`s 157,000 ounces of annual production. No point wasting such capabilities with a $1,165 gold price available. If they have success with the new drill program (in moving more near-surface ounces into P&P) then I hope management will be able to implement a new mine plan to scale up from 105,000 ounces of production to 150,000 ounces within the next couple of years (prior to the shafts being ready). If so, we could become a mid-tier gold producer just from organic growth alone, with 180,000 ounces of production (150K Lamaque and 30K San Juan).


11) `On the exploration and geology front, the Company controls significant property positions in Canada, Peru and the United States that have been barely explored, and provide additional excellent discovery upside for the Company as we look to appoint a new VP Geology in the near future,`

Once Lamaque is more established, I would like to see us get going with our Northbelt (Yellowknife), NWT property, either with a JV partner running with it or us driving it alone (100%).

I`m ok either way, despite Peggy`s reputation in that part of the wooks. There are no gold mines in the area anymore. The economic crisis has beaten down places like. Creating jobs (without sacrificing the environment of course) should be a top priority in northern Canada. The Federal government earlier in the year allocated funding ($12M I think) towards beefing up northern administrative departments in Canada to allow for projects to processed faster, especially in the mining industry. They want to make northern Canada more business friendly, while still not harming the environment.

I think a JV situation works best for us, but I don`t mine Century moving the property forward by itself with Finskiy and Scola being the investor face and significant shareholders in the company.

Everything I have seen about Northbelt makes me believe that we have significant potential for a mine on this property (this could be our 4th organic mine - see Carolin below for the 3rd mine).

The property has a 15 kilometre strike length, in a 10M (+) ounce production (proven) volcanic belt. There are already 2 established non-43101 deposits already delineated on the property.

One of the mineralized structures has 135,000 ounces (4.0 g/t grade) at relatively shallow depths. What`s really exciting about it is that it is both open along strike (open in all directions) and at depth. The second deposit has about 45,000 ounces (about 10 g/t grade) and is likely open also.

There are numerous gold showings along the property also.

There is also a large zinc showing, but that`s secondary as it is not our focus right now. At the very least, I would like to see either us or a JV partner get up there and start punching holes at least in the 135,000 ounce structure (if not both deposits) where we know for sure it is open in all direction. Hundreds of exploration companies waste millions of dollars trying unsuccessfully to find ore bodies. We have already found at least a couple of ore bodies on this property (potentially a lot more). No point wasting it with $1,165 gold.

If we are not going to consolidate the small producers in the Val d`Or area for a while then I would like us to bring Carolin / Module back in-house (via takeover). We still own most of the Carolin Mine.

Module has done a good job under the circumstances - they have struggled mightily with raising funds.

Carolin will never be a spectacular mining operation but it could still be very fruitful. I really like the exploration results shown by Module.

I think the property has 700,000 - 1,000,000 ounce potential.

With advancement of exploration, I think it can be a 50,000 - 60,000 ounce operation that can be fast tracked into production. This can be Century`s 3rd organic mine. However, a lot of exploration work needs to done and I don`t think Module is in a position to move aggressively (like Century will be).

I think it`s almost zero risk for Century to bring in-house.

Century can still keep the Module geologist to be dedicated with running with the project. Module has a market cap of only about $1.6M. Century can probably bring them in-house for far less than $5M. Best I can understand, the Deutsche Bank agreement allows for acquisitions of $5M (or less) at anytime. Module shareholders get to share in the upside to all of Century, while Century can ensure that Carolin moves aggressively forward, and hopefully becomes our 3rd organic mine. Carolin already has a lot of infrastructure in place (as a past producer). As a result, it should be less costly to develop than a brand new mining operation. Of course, it`s totally impossible to know right now, but my guess would be in the $20M - $40M range (excluding exploration costs). It`s the type of small organic growth that Century should be able to handle through cash flow over time.

12) No mention in the NR about starting to review strategic opportunities. You almost get the feeling that the other small producers are not quite ready to pool their assets together with Century to form a powerful $2 - 3 billion gold mining player.

I`m ok with that also. I am also ok if they want to team up with another company. As I`ve identified above, Century has plenty of organic opportunities to work with. I don`t have a problem with Century just sitting back and growing it`s cash position - maybe do a one time dividend payout to shareholders (as a reward to all of the long suffering Century shareholders).

If the small Val d`Or area producers (and their shareholders) don`t want to cut a deal with Century, and don`t want Peggy, Finskiy and Scola to use their connections to arrange debt financing deals for them then I`m ok with that.

However, I`m looking at their numbers and it makes me wonder how they are going to move forward without taking a hit. It also gives me the impression that Peggy and Finskiy are just going to sit back for a while and let them feel the pain until them come to their senses.

Best I can tell, Alexis Minerals (AMC) had a $4.2M debt due today and $2.1M due in July. They also have $13.7M in current payables. They need to raise $33.7M to develope the Snow Lake Mine.

It`s not clear how much more they need to move their Lac Pelletier operation forward (they are in feasibility phase) but I remember seeing an old number of $8M. They also need to perform vital exploration on at least a couple of their key development properties. I think they still have a bit of cash, but I guess is that it`s very little relative to cash needs. They currently have almost 220M shares outstadning. At a $.30 share price, if they were to cover all these cash needs via PP then that works out to 205M more shares with say 103M full warrants (assuming half warrants per share given).

Northern Star Mining (NSM) has a $42M debt amount ($31M * 1.375 redemption rate - best I can tell) coming due mid next year.

It`s hard to believe that Richmont Mines (RIC) would want to truck their ore 110 km and 100 km for processing when their are more economical solutions available, but who knows, maybe they do.
Posted by production05 at 11:57 AM 1 comments

stockigloo.com