SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LBAS - Location Based Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: notimetowaste2 who wrote (126)4/23/2010 1:57:33 PM
From: koolaidRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 152
 
"was no attempt to even execute the SPA and make the first transfer" - how do you know? Could they have held out to let the stock price drop down lower before making the first payments thus getting cheaper price and better return? If I were them that is what I would do, plus wait until LBAS drew closer to AT&T approval.



To: notimetowaste2 who wrote (126)4/26/2010 11:28:13 PM
From: koolaidRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 152
 
If you are in the business, it shouldn't be to hard to give me a couple example companies and exhibit #'s of SPA's for me to look over. Also, you mention the stock decline over the preceding 30 days as a reason the SPA is BS. Although I am an amateur, I would look a lot deeper into the company than just a 30 stock price before I invesed $10 mill. I would hope the execution date of 2/8/2010 for this contract was only made after several months, if not a year or more, of due diligence.

Regarding your comment about the stock price being manipulated and proped up because you can't buy or sell even 1% of the stock without greatly affecting the stock price, I thought that was par for the over the counter course? If not, this amateur would appreciate some more examples of OTC companies that can handle higher than 1% volume days without a significant price change.

I am open minded to everyones opinion but would appreciate some back up.