SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (245280)4/22/2010 11:09:24 PM
From: Pogeu MahoneRespond to of 306849
 
Here is another shining example of the good police officers-s-

Connecticut Town Grapples With Claims of Police Bias
By NINA BERNSTEIN
Since 2008, officials in East Haven, Conn., a working-class suburb with a long history of toxic relations between the police and minorities, have played down Latinos’ complaints of accelerating police harassment and brutality.

Local officials appeared unperturbed when the Justice Department opened a rare investigation last fall into allegations of discriminatory policing in the town and Yale law students went to court to force the release of police records. The police chief denied any bias and blamed any problems on the failure of federal immigration policy. The mayor said she was unaware of any racial discrimination and supported the police.

But in recent days, the town seemed to have turned an unexpected corner.

In an unusual step, the Justice Department warned the town attorney in a letter on April 15 that its preliminary review showed the Police Department was a shambles, with no modern rules of conduct for officers, no check on their use of force, inadequate training and no functioning citizen complaint system.

On Wednesday, the mayor, April Capone Almon, backed by a quick and unanimous vote of the police commission board, ordered the veteran police chief, Leonard Gallo, to turn in his badge and gun, placing him on administrative leave.

And on Thursday, just as the Yale students completed a damning analysis of recent traffic tickets — almost 60 percent went to people with Hispanic surnames, who make up about 6 percent of the town’s population — a different revelation became an Internet sensation. Weeks earlier, the mayor had donated a kidney to Carlos Sanchez, a local office worker she barely knew.

If that gesture might someday be remembered as a turning point in the town’s troubled relations with its Hispanic population, Mayor Capone Almon maintained that she had never thought of it as a way to build bridges.

“He was just a person who needed help,” said the mayor, who has recovered from the operation on April 8. She was bracing for a round of national television and radio interviews about her organ donation to Mr. Sanchez, who had posted an appeal on Facebook.

To Valarie Kaur, one of the law students who prepared the complaint to the Justice Department and battled for police documents under the Freedom of Information Act, the spotlight on the town was a chance to highlight the larger issues at stake.

“This is a promising moment for East Haven,” she said. “In the midst of a national debate on policing and immigration, East Haven has the opportunity to lead by example — to change the culture of the Police Department, enforce the law and protect all its residents.”

The mayor, who was arrested in September after she tried to stop a police officer from towing cars at the beach, would not say whether her decision to put the police chief on leave with pay was a first step in changing the department’s culture.

Instead, she pointed to the statement she made when she released the Justice Department’s letter: “My concern is how to prevent this from exposing the town to liability, which would ultimately cost taxpayers money.”

A Democrat who was re-elected to a second term in November, Ms. Capone Almon said she had not changed her views on the town’s Hispanic community, which has nearly quadrupled in the past two decades to about 1,900 people, according to census estimates.

“I have a wonderful relationship with the Hispanic community,” she said. “The Hispanic community has concerns with other departments in town, and I have done my best to remedy that situation.”

Along Main Street on Thursday, there were conflicting opinions about her action. George Jennett, 63, a livery driver, seemed to waver between sympathy for the mayor and support for police efforts to catch drivers without licenses or registration. “I don’t see it as racial profiling,” he said.

But many Hispanic residents, including citizens and legal residents with businesses on Main Street, have reported being pulled over while driving or being accosted in parked cars by police, apparently because of their appearance. And the law students’ data, analyzed by statisticians at Yale, support that perception.

To combat racial profiling, Connecticut law requires police officers to report the race or ethnicity of those they ticket or arrest. But officers mischaracterized the race or ethnicity of the vast majority of those they stopped and gave tickets, the report said. They checked off “Hispanic” or “White/Hispanic” for 22 of the 373 legible tickets, but reported nearly all as “White.”

In fact, of all 376 traffic tickets issued on Main Street and Route 80 from June 2008 to February 2009, 210 — or 56 percent — were given to people with Hispanic surnames, the report found. One officer issued nearly 80 percent of his tickets to people with Hispanic surnames, yet reported that nearly 97 percent went to whites.

The Justice Department is investigating traffic stops that allegedly turned into brutal encounters, some involving the use of Tasers or pepper spray on handcuffed Latinos. It is also looking at complaints of retaliation against those who publicly complained.

Marcia Chacon, a parishioner at St. Rose of Lima Church, was one of the first to speak out last spring after her pastor, the Rev. James Manship, was arrested at her store on Main Street as he tried to videotape a police visit. Afterward, she said, patrol cars waited outside the store; officers stopped her and her husband as they tried to drive home.

Now, she feels vindicated. “I feel happy and content that justice is being done,” she said.

Robert Davey contributed reporting.


More in N.Y. / Region (3 of 22 articles)
A Pastor’s Job Offers Become a Curse
Read More »

Close



To: GST who wrote (245280)4/26/2010 3:13:33 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
1 in 3 San Francisco employees earned $100,000

sfgate.com

More than 1 in 3 of San Francisco's nearly 27,000 city workers earned $100,000 or more last year - a number that has been growing steadily for the past decade.

The number of city workers paid at least $100,000 in base salary totaled 6,449 last year. When such extras as overtime are included, the number jumped to 9,487 workers, nearly eight times the number from a decade ago. And that calculation doesn't include the cost of often-generous city benefits such as health care and pensions.

<< See database of city's top earners >>

The pay data obtained by The Chronicle show that many of the high earners bolstered their base pay with overtime and "other pay," a category that includes payouts for unused vacation days and extra money for working late-night shifts.

Leading 2009's $100,000 Club was the Police Department's Charles Keohane, a deputy chief who retired midyear.

His total payout was $516,118, city records show, the bulk of which came from cashing out stored-up vacation, sick days and comp time. Several other police employees who changed rank or retired also saw their annual earnings swell.

When asked how he felt about landing in the No. 1 spot, Keohane joked, "Not so good, if it's going to get my name in the paper."

The 36-year SFPD veteran, whose last assignment was head of administration, said much of that pay was taken out in taxes. "I helped reduce the deficit," he said.

The average city worker salary in San Francisco is $93,000 before benefits, according to Deputy City Controller Monique Zmuda. The data take into account everyone from park gardeners and street cleaners to attorneys and technology specialists.

Almost 100 city employees made $200,000 or more in 2009; six bumped past $300,000 when overtime and other cash-outs were included.

Muni chief's base pay
Only one city employee had a base salary topping $300,000. Nathaniel Ford, executive director of the Municipal Transportation Agency, made $332,489.

Mayor Gavin Newsom had a base salary of $250,903 in 2009, which put him 29th on the list of best-paid city employees.

The ballooning number of highly paid workers is driven by several factors, including inflation, a persistent reliance on overtime and generous contracts in a city known for its politically potent unions.

The city also negotiated a deal to give raises to some workers who agreed to pick up a portion of their pension contributions, City Controller Ben Rosenfield said. That arrangement pushed almost 2,000 city employees above the $100,000 mark in recent years, he said.

In years past, the $100,000 Club included large numbers of Muni operators, transit supervisors, firefighters, police officers and sheriff's deputies who padded their paychecks with hundreds of hours of overtime, paid out at a rate of time-and-a-half.

But a 2008 rule capped most employees' overtime to 30 percent of base pay, in effect spreading out overtime opportunities to more employees, Zmuda said. That and other efforts to curtail overtime appear to be working, with payments projected to drop to $139.8 million this fiscal year, down from $142.1 million last year and $167.7 million the year before, according to the controller's office.

In the fiscal year that ended in June 2009, city salaries accounted for $2.5 billion of the $6.6 billion budget. That does not include the cost of benefits.

Faced with a $483 million deficit heading into the new fiscal year that starts July 1, Newsom is looking to reduce labor costs to help plug the gap.

The mayor last week struck a tentative deal with union negotiators that includes 12 furlough days, equivalent to a 4.6 percent pay cut, for about 90 percent of city workers. The mayor also has asked city department heads and their top managers to take a 10 percent pay cut. The mayor and his chief of staff plan to give up 15 percent of their salary.

Good work
For some government jobs, San Francisco pays similar salaries as other Bay Area jurisdictions, according to compensation surveys compiled by the city's Department of Human Resources.

For example, a stationary engineer in San Francisco earns a maximum annual base salary of $72,488, 1.6 percent above the Bay Area average. A San Francisco police officer has a maximum base salary of $102,648, 2.8 percent above the average.

Payroll clerks, however, have a base salary of $54,314, 16.4 percent higher than the average, and firefighters make $100,646 in base salary, 6.6 percent above the average, the surveys showed.

San Francisco Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Steve Falk said that annual salaries of $100,000 or more aren't as eye-popping as they were a decade ago.

"I don't think the $100,000 pay threshold continues to be the best measure of city government efficiency. It is certainly a good tool for monitoring anomalies and excessive overtime pay, but the real concern is the pay comparison with the private sector," he said.

Above private sector
He pointed to state Employment Development Department data that show city workers on average earn 20 percent more than those in the private sector in San Francisco.

In addition, Falk said, city workers "have significantly better health and pension benefits" that continue to be the biggest cost driver threatening city services. That needs to be reformed, he said.

Many of the highest-earning city employees - including engineers, doctors and attorneys - are paid comparably to their counterparts in the private sector or can help make up for earning less pay with better benefits.

"City government is becomingly increasingly technical and more sophisticated, and you have to pay for the talent," said Bob Muscat, head of Professional and Technical Engineers Local 21.

Read more: sfgate.com



To: GST who wrote (245280)4/27/2010 2:36:51 PM
From: Skeeter BugRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
GST, that's false.

i mentioned britain which used it to grow into the biggest power on earth over a 700 year period.

andrew jackson ZEROED out the debt on debt free money and abraham lincoln financed the war on debt free money (so called green backs).

btw, lincoln was assassinated and debt based money was restored by the bankers.

there was high inflation when lincoln had green backs, but that was apparently due to massive war time counterfeiting operations.

an assassination attempt on jackson failed.

"the money masters" on google video is an excellent presentation of the battle between the international banking cartel and those in government who tried to support the people of the nation. it is jam packed with excellent information.

if a monetary system worked for 700 years and resulted in the biggest empire on earth, isn't it worth a look?

we haven't gone 100 years and our system has collapsed and society is being asset stripped into oblivion.

or is the head in the sand just a comfortable position for some?