SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pancho Villa who wrote (9649)11/5/1997 8:34:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 45548
 
(CORRECTED)-Traders fear glitches in next frenzy Reuters Story - November 05, 1997 19:58 %STX %FIN %ELC %US %DRU %INS %BUS CPQ RTR.L DELL SCH OXHP V%REUTER P%RTR NEW YORK, Nov 2 (Reuters) - A few days after record trading volume strained the computer that tabulates the Nasdaq Market's Composite Index, traders fear technical glitches in Nasdaq's computer systems will prevent them from properly executing buy-and-sell orders in another market frenzy. "For systems just to be able to accept customers' orders, they are going to need a major overhaul," Bill Sulya, director of trading at A.G. Edwards & Sons said. Sulya said that on Tuesday, when a record 1.375 billion shares changed hands amid the Nasdaq's biggest one-day point gain ever, some traders waited nearly an hour to see the prices at which they executed their trades. According to Sulya, in a full-scale market panic, "You might term that as a mini-disaster." A Nasdaq spokesman said Nasdaq's trading systems currently contain no technical glitches, and did not before Tuesday's record volume. According to the spokesman, as trading volume increased on Tuesday, Nasdaq added capacity to its automated confirmation transaction system to accommodate more trades. Originally set to handle one million trades, the system's capacity was boosted to five million after the additional capacity was added. "We have no plans to modify our system in the near-term," the spokesman said. "We did it that day (Tuesday) and that evening." Norman Goldberg, vice president of financial services industry marketing for Tandem Computers Inc. , said Nasdaq's hardware operated well under the heavy volume. Tandem, a unit of Compaq Computer Corp., provides computers to Nasdaq. "Nasdaq has been progressively adding hardware to handle volume growth," Goldberg said. (Corrects quotations to show Goldberg was discussing Nasdaq hardware) Nasdaq, for its part, said it has invested nearly $500 million since the 1987 stock market crash, including $50 million the last three years, to boost its capacity to handle heavy trading volume. That annual spending trend should continue, a Nasdaq spokesman said. Since Tuesday, traders said they have had little trouble executing trades on Nasdaq or elsewhere. Still, the surge of opening-bell trades throughout the week forced exchanges like Nasdaq to make some minor adjustments. In before-the-bell trading on Thursday, Nasdaq took the system that quotes other markets' shares on Nasdaq terminals, called ITS -- or intermarket trading system -- off-line for five to 10 minutes to free up capacity for stock quotes, according to a Nasdaq spokesman. Trading was not affected, he said. When trading began that day, U.S. stocks plunged initially amid concern over Brazil's currency, before bouncing back soon thereafter and then falling again to close the day lower. The early rush to sell showed that heavy volume bursts pose technical concerns not only for Nasdaq, but for all of Wall Street, traders and investors said. Reuters Holdings Plc's Instinet terminals, which handle a large amount of institutional trading each day, went down early on Thursday, compounding problems for investors trading options in Dell Computer Corp , which was then Nasdaq's most active stock. An Instinet spokesman said that during the past week, Instinet's systems were marginally affected by the heavy volume in global markets, as were other brokers' technology, along with markets and exchanges around the world. Specifically regarding Dell, "Instinet's clients were only unable to trade for a brief period Thursday," the spokesman said. "(Dell's) stock, however, continued to trade through other brokers," he added. The heavy volume created problems for investors trading through discount broker Charles Schwab Corp. , too. On Thursday, investors using Schawb's telebroker service to trade shares of Oxford Health Plans Inc. , whose shares lost nealy two-thirds of their value during Monday's market selloff, got a message telling them their trades could not be processed due to the stock's heavy volume. According to a Schwab spokeswoman, the message should not have been there at the time. "We've left the messages on that we've had running Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, because it takes us a very long time to put those messages up on telebroker," the spokeswoman said. "But now we are back to normal levels, nobody is waiting at all," she added. Jack Bayer, head over-the-counter trader at Oppenheimer & Co., said on Friday that all trading systems he encountered that day were working fine, although perhaps that was because trading was comparatively light. He said that on Tuesday, it was Oppenheimer's own in-house system -- not Nasdaq's or any other system -- that went haywire. Late on Friday, he summed up the massive-volume trading week, saying, "This week was like one long root canal -- without novocaine."



To: Pancho Villa who wrote (9649)11/5/1997 9:09:00 PM
From: gfr fan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 45548
 
<<Pancho

PS: so any other views in Cisco from an COMS perspecteve? This is probably my
weakest point in investing. I can tell a good company but I can not assess its
competition without studing mayor competitors. Must admit have not put any time
into researching Cisco.>>

Pancho, I think CSCO and COMS are the class of the networking industry and you probably would want to own both. CSCO has had a better year stock wise, so it is probably more fairly valued. COMS represents a potentially greater reward, albeit with higher risk. This is because Wall Street has beaten down the price of COMS over concerns with the USR merger. Not to be unexpected with an acquisition of this size. However, if COMS executes and accelerates growth and earnings over the next 2-3 quarters, you'll probably have a return that is the highest in the networking sector based upon current prices.

Bruce