Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (245429)	4/23/2010 5:35:51 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 306849

>>No drinking No red meat No white starches Dropped my diastolic BP under 80 Said I worked out for 30-minutes a day 7-days a week. Said I was more social. Said I had a relative live over 100. Said there was no cancer in my family.<< LOL, if that were yer lifestyle why would you wanna live another DAY let alone 60 more years!<G>

To: ajtj99 who wrote (245429)	4/23/2010 5:38:58 PM
From: John Chen	Respond to of 306849

" and I came up with 110-years. " Pending on the AGING process of the gov/WS/FED, the 'THING', you may choose to have shorter life-span, unless you're the kind who can enjoy the unthinkable of mankind in history. AWESOME.

To: ajtj99 who wrote (245429)	4/23/2010 5:41:07 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

the fact they calculate red meat as a longevity impairment (along with sugary fruit juices as a longevity enhancement) tells me much of the test is basically GIGO and some of the question were ambiguous imo, for example i believe one of the questions asks about the longevity of parents but they include a question about a 'family member living into their 90's' i assuming if you chose the latter, as opposed to for example in my case parents died in their 70's/80's, i would get a higher score...since my grandmother lived to the age of 94 i picked her instead of my parents <edit> also i included 'online' friends in my answer to their social networking question, which probably doesn't accurately reflect their bias, but for me it is just as relevant (at least where casual acquaintances are concerned)

To: ajtj99 who wrote (245429)	4/23/2010 9:28:51 PM
From: coug	Respond to of 306849

So I took this test fwiw, just for sh!ts and grins.. And you know what I came up with, with very honest answers was 83..? Eighty three, f'ng years old, which seems about right for me.. As based upon my life style of living life as it should be. living each day as it was my last. I have been told that btw. :) And from the experience of my relatives.. I couldn't answer a lot of the questions, as I haven't had a formal checkup in 30-40 years, no fancy blood tests to test for good or bad choleseral or this or for that.. Those kind of health type test expenses in my mind would just take away health stuff from younger people that really need it.. Give it to the young and not to me.. That's just the way I am.. I don't want to spend my last 20 years as the test indicates, worrying about things I have NO control over.. Except for my own lifestyle.. And burdening an already clusterf!ck of a health care system on ME with TESTS.. I am like my Dad who went quietly on his own at 91 with no burden on anyone.. :)

To: ajtj99 who wrote (245429)	4/23/2010 11:01:11 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Tell them you smoke pot for medicinal reasons you will live to 125-vbg- Google Advanced Search Web Results 1 - 10 of about 554,000 for pot smoke does not cause cancer. (0.57 seconds) Search Results Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection - washingtonpost.com May 25, 2006 ... The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer. www.washingtonpost.com › Health - Similar Pot Smoking Not Linked to Lung Cancer May 23, 2006 ... People who smoke marijuana do not appear to be at increased risk for developing lung ... Carcinogens are substances that cause cancer. ... www.webmd.com/...cancer/.../pot-smoking-not-linked-to-lung-cancer - Cached - Similar Fred Gardner: Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung CancerJul 2, 2005 ... Marijuana smoking -"even heavy longterm use"- does not cause cancer of the lung, upper airwaves, or esophagus, Donald Tashkin reported at ... www.counterpunch.org/gardner07022005.html - Cached - Similar Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung Cancer \| Drugs \| AlterNetNew research shows here seems to be something in pot that actually undermines cancer, instead of causing it. -- and the media are doing their best to ignore ... www.alternet.org/.../smoking_marijuana_does_not_cause_lung_cancer/ - Cached Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung Cancer \| The Media Freedom ...Dec 2, 2009 ... Research at UCLA shows that while smoking marijuana damages cells in respiratory tissue but somehow it prevents the cells from becoming ... www.mediafreedominternational.org/.../smoking-marijuana-does-not-cause-lung-cancer/ - Cached Myths and Facts About MarijuanaMarijuana does not cause profound changes in people's behavior. .... Marijuana smokers are at a high risk of developing lung cancer, bronchitis, ... Like tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke contains a number of irritants and carcinogens. ... www.drugpolicy.org › Marijuana - Cached - Similar Fact Sheet - MARIJUANAResearch shows that students do not remember what they have learned when they ... Can marijuana cause cancer? Marijuana smoke has been found to contain more ... www.well.com/user/woa/fspot.htm - Cached - Similar Smoking Cannabis Does Not Cause Cancer Of Lung - CCRMGMarijuana smoking —“even heavy longterm use”— does not cause cancer of the lung, upper airways, or esophagus, Donald Tashkin, MD, reported at this year's ... www.ccrmg.org/journal/05aut/nocancer.html - Cached - Similar Study: Smoking Pot does not Cause CancerStudy: Smoking Pot Doesn't Cause Cancer--It May Prevent It! By FRED GARDNER. May 3 / 4, 2008. Smoking Cannabis Does Not Cause Cancer Of Lung or Upper ... www.blackherbals.com/study_smoking%20pot_does_not_cause_cancer.htm - Cached Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer? Marijuana and Your Lung ...May 24, 2006 ... I heard that smoking marijuana will not cause lung cancer. Is this true? Does smoking marijuana increase my risk for lung cancer? ... cancer.about.com/od/smokingandcancer/f/marijuana.htm - Cached - Similar Searches related to pot smoke does not cause cancer does smoking pot cause lung cancer does smoking weed cause testicular cancer can smoking weed give you cancer