Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (361026)	4/24/2010 3:14:09 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793957

I was thinking about this the other day. Had things been different and we now had a Hillary administration, she likely would have done things much the same. My guess is that Hillary is somewhat less doctrinaire than the Jimmy Carter types who surround Obama, esp. wrt. fp, and politically she is more experienced -- she and Bill found out the hard way what happens when you push too far to the left too fast. I think she would have tried to avoid repeating the experience of 1994. Obama is fixing to relive it, probably even more so.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (361026)	4/24/2010 11:53:59 AM
From: Brumar89	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793957

Hillary wouldn't have been any different on health care. Ditto on the environment, financial reform, taking over the car companies, ... . She wouldn't snub as many foreign allies as Obama has. She wouldn't have appointed as many of the weird far leftist czars Obama has - people who call themselves communists, say they want to "queer" the schools, praise Mao Tse Tung, who wrote books calling for putting birth control in the water, etc. She'd have appointed more establishment liberals, fewer university campus type leftwing goofballs. The flavor would be different but probably not the substance. JMO