Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (3858)	4/26/2010 8:05:09 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<Thats an example of what I'm talking about. What does that mean? > Interesting you ask NOW... you rejected the idea out of hand the first time around... still... at least you asked about what you didn't understand, and that WAS a major complaint of mine... so let me address the second part and then we'll see if you still don't know what I"m talking about: <Try writing in sentences. Not disjointed stream of conscienceness style ramblings.> You dont' understand this: <<you mean you still want to argue that the science behind support evolution (endless research across multiple disciplines by independent researchers) is inferior to the science behind FDA approval process (a government agency with a budget I'll let you look up) for foods and additives???>> Here... let me insert the "for" I forgot for you? Here: "you mean you still want to argue that the science behind support ""FOR"" evolution (endless research across multiple disciplines by independent researchers) is inferior to the science behind FDA approval process (a government agency with a budget I'll let you look up) for foods and additives???>> A little better? Again, you didn't seem to care when you rejected the idea out of hand the first time around, but if you still aren't sure what I mean, let me know. DAK