SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (361378)4/26/2010 3:18:00 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794302
 
The 9th Circuit is allowing a massive sex discimination class action case to proceed against Wal-Mart. The class includes all female employees on and after 1998.

ca9.uscourts.gov

Check out the organizations filing amicus briefs. I am certain most are "non-profits" and that many are recipients of government funds.

Here's the summary:

Plaintiffs allege that Wal-Mart, Inc., discriminates against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After detailed briefing and hearing, the district court certified a class encompassing all women employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and encompassing all Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay, while creating a separate opt-out class encompassing the same employees for punitive damages. We affirm the district court’s certification of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) class of current employees with respect to their claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay. With respect to the claims for punitive damages, we remand so that the district court may consider whether to certify the class under Rule 23(b)(2) or (b)(3). We also remand with respect to the claims of putative class members who no longer worked for Wal-Mart when the complaint was filed so that the district court may consider whether to certify an additional class or classes under Rule 23(b)(3).



To: KLP who wrote (361378)4/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
From: DMaA1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794302
 
I should have said it's time for reasonable people to think about our military usage. There's no point talking to democrats about anything.