Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Alternative energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7964)	4/28/2010 2:28:04 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

Tentative Solar Investing Rule #7: National Champions will be among the survivors. Solar and wind are both going to have an extended period of consolidation, winnowing out the weaker companies. In a capital-intensive cyclical industry, access to cheap capital is crucial, to surviving downturns, and being well-prepared to take advantage of the subsequent upturn. Governments have the deepest pockets. Also, given how heavily regulated the entire energy industry is, a close relationship with policy-makers is a big advantage. The only National Champions in solar are Trina and Suntech in China. Neither Europe nor the U.S. has committed to a domestic industry, or aggressively backed dominant local companies, the way China has. Trina got a contract for a big R&D facility, while TSL and STP shared those billions in loans. LDK got part of its polysilicon factory bought for a price above what the market price would have been, but that support by the government isn't in the same class as for TSL and STP. I haven't read about anything being done specifically for YGE or JASO or CSIQ. In the U.S., the only solar company that looks like a survivor is FSLR. However, they have little U.S. government support targeted specifically at them, and most of their production is in Malaysia anyway. Maybe a rising tide of economic nationalism will change that. This rule also applies to wind, where there is a longer list of clearly dominant National Champions: GE in the U.S., Suzlon in India, Mitsubishi in Japan. Europe has too many Champions, a legacy of their earlier dominance in wind energy. Denmark and Spain have Vestas and Gamesa, while Germany has Enercon, Nordex, and Siemans. Those 5 probably need to winnowed down to 2 or 3. China has Sinovel, Goldwind, and Donfang, which will probably get winnowed down to 1 or 2 eventually.