Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: heinz44 who wrote (38075)	4/28/2010 12:14:40 AM
From: TheSlowLane	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 233786

Occam's Razor...the simplest explanation is the best, i.e. they are, in fact, on to something big. Is there hand-waving? Maybe so, but I would submit, maybe deservedly so. Miwah is substantial, I don't think there is any question about that any more. No they do not have a 43-101, but that was a tactical decision the merits of which can be debated. Investors in junior mining stocks should be glad to see companies tack on 1000% and still have upside. This sector needs liquidity and volume to accommodate an influx of capital, and hey, a rising tide will float all the boats (except the holey ones). <g>

To: heinz44 who wrote (38075)	4/28/2010 9:43:24 AM
From: ogi	3 Recommendations Respond to of 233786

I am not sure what talk OR ""promo game-letter writers "" you refer to etc; the Coffins and thus by default Pescod, were the only people talking about EAS that I know of and much of that talk was HOW SURPRISING IT WAS that EAS was getting no other coverage. That has changed only in recent weeks or months. The idea it could be big early was partly because it was drilled in 1997 and had a preliminary estimate of over a mil ozs,. good starting point for EAS.