Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (563395)	4/28/2010 9:38:47 AM
From: Brumar89	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576865

What manifestations of racism? The madeup stuff?

To: tejek who wrote (563395)	4/28/2010 10:57:24 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576865

Congressional Budget Office: Financial reform puts taxpayers on the hook for $58 billion By: Mark Hemingway Commentary Staff Writer 04/26/10 1:51 PM EDT Here’s what the CBO’s official cost estimate of the legislation says: <<< The total amount collected from assessments is estimated to be about $58 billion through 2020. But such assessments would become an additional business expense for companies required to pay them. Those additional expenses would result in decreases in taxable income somewhere in the economy, which would produce a loss of government revenue from income and payroll taxes that would partially offset the revenue collected from the assessment itself. >>> The Heritage Foundation observes this $58 billion might just be the beginning of taxpayer bailouts ensconced in the financial reform law being proposed: <<< In other words, these financial firms have to get that $58 billion dollars from somewhere, and that somewhere is you. Now the Obama administration may argue that they actually oppose the creation of the resolution fund. But American taxpayers should be even more frightened when they find out why the Obama administration opposes it. The New York Times reports: “The Obama administration does not support the $50 billion fund, partly out of concern that more money may be needed if one or more big financial firms ever collapse and that creating a fund could make it difficult to authorize more money.” AEI’s Peter Wallison details CBO how this provision could put taxpayer on the hook for much larger sums: >>> Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com

To: tejek who wrote (563395)	4/28/2010 12:40:23 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576865

The racism manifested is rather small. And in at least a few cases was by infiltrators, not by people sharing the tea party ideas of freedom, limited government, reduced spending, and more fiscal discipline as their central concerns. All in all its essentially a non-issue except in the words of those who want to trump it up to falsely tar their opponents and try to shut them out of the political debate. Again the tea party protests have generally been much better behaved than those of many protests groups on the left.