Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (38120)	4/28/2010 10:21:53 AM
From: Veteran98	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233786

Re:SSL wasn't in yet but at these levels especially if one is still entitled to the spin out it looks like a good entry on the selloff....

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (38120)	4/28/2010 12:08:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 233786

ssl.v - thanks for your thoughts on Sandstorm Claude, that's how i see it, good long term hold, i had it on shortlist for adding and was glad of the selloff yesterday It's not that easy to valuate a royalty model, you have to plug in several assumptions like price of gold and interest rates to get anything meaningful ... remember how poorly understood was fn.to twenty and twenty-five years ago, well it sort of proved itself ... i had a nice little second-time position in Franco, sold most at less than a double, aargh, got impatient when it levelled out for months, probably put the funds in some stupid loser, possibly in the William A Trimble promotion ape.v, roughly same time [edit] - ric.to - how enthusiastic are you today on Richmont, if i may ask ... sold down to 4.25 this morning, i had an order in just above that last week, got very few shs so far, not fully up to date on developments [edit 2] - the spin-off on ssl.v is not that significant, one thirty-fifth, less than three per cent difference ... but i like that they're streamlining the model, they'll get market value just for that in a logical world