Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (43039)	5/3/2010 11:45:24 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "I asked you for the specific federal limitation...." No problem. Here it is: The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Birther measure dies from lack of support Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services April 29, 2010 - 4:32PM eastvalleytribune.com Barack Obama won’t be required to produce his birth certificate for Arizona officials if he decides to run for reelection. Sen. Jack Harper, R-Surprise, said Thursday not enough of the 18 Republicans in the state Senate support the House-approved measure. And with all 12 Democrats opposed, Harper said it makes no sense to force the issue to a vote. House votes to check candidates' citizenship But Harper defended the merits of the change, rebuffing claims by critics that the measure is silly. Rep. Judy Burges, R-Skull Valley, introduced the measure in the wake of controversy on whether the president is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Burges said the measure is not necessarily about Obama. But she admitted she doubts he was born in Hawaii as he claims, or that he can show he is a U.S. citizen. “With what’s happening throughout the world, we need to make sure that our candidates are certifiable,” she said. Burges said she wants a president’s citizenship — and, as she sees it, loyalty — to be clear. “We want to make sure that we have candidates that are going to stand up for the United States of America.” As approved by the House, the language, stripped by Burges into a related Harper bill, would have required political parties to submit to the Arizona secretary of state “documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate’s age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States.” More to the point, it would have given the secretary of state the unilateral power to keep a candidate off the Arizona ballot if he or she has “reasonable cause” to believe the candidate is not qualified. Harper supported the change and lobbied his GOP colleagues to approve the House version. He said, though, it’s not a partisan thing. “It’s not about Barack Obama,” Harper said. “He has shown his birth certificates and birth announcements, from the time he was born, in Hawaii newspapers.” What it is about, Harper said, is “states’ rights.” “It’s our ballot,” he said. “We have the right to ask somebody to prove that they constitutionally have the ability to hold office.” That, however, may not be true. Matthew Benson, press aide to Secretary of State Ken Bennett, said his boss believes the measure would have violated the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution by having states set eligibility requirements for candidates for federal office.