Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (13882)	11/5/1997 10:39:00 PM
From: Rashid Garuba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Mike, Why don't you just ask? How can RMIL shareholders help Mork? Rashid

To: michael d kugler who wrote (13882)	11/5/1997 10:40:00 PM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

I don't think so. You've said there couldn't be a short postion in this stock. Now you're saying there is. You were all over that first bogus lawsuit, now it's moot. Etc. Etc. Methinks you have blinded yourself. Are you trying to uncover a scam or create one?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (13882)	11/5/1997 10:45:00 PM
From: Wskymn99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

OK Mike, let's assume that your soap opera theory is correct. Does this then excuse the attacking and slandering of RMIL? Does this change the fact that he has opened himself up to a class- action lawsuit? Also does this change the fact that he is short and will have to cover? Please don't give me that "he doesn't need to cover" line again. It's ridiculous and you know it. I know you are smarter than that. The certificates have been requested and need to come to the rightful, legal owners.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (13882)	11/5/1997 11:01:00 PM
From: Roo	Respond to of 55532

Sorry Mike, regardless of the "sexy shory squeeze" story (which I am fully prepared to take my losses on in the event of failure), I'm having a real problem with you- with your hypocritical position on the performance of Due Diligence (yeas must prove all beyond a reasonable doubt, yet nays must simply get someone's word for it)- with your blatantly obvious intent to kill this stock by convincing holders to sell (perhaps, just perhaps so Mork could cover his meager 100K short position in the least painful manner for him)- and with your poorly supported claims that you are here to help the weak-minded (or is it just your own fraud-busting reputation). But most significant I believe is your arrogant assertions that now is the time to sell with no regard for the impact this would have on other long investors or on naive and/or ignorant new investors who would be left holding the bag when the selloff is over. -R#42 Y'know, you used to be a pretty reasonable guy, and (dare I say it?) even respectable.