Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (14031)	11/5/1997 11:54:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Respond to of 55532

Did your investors just talk to Dempsey Mork? I'm sure he would say anything to be cover 60,000 shares that he shorted out of his own pocket. Not to mention the one's his Canadian buddies shorted or his company. Kurt

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (14031)	11/5/1997 11:56:00 PM
From: Rashid Garuba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Matty, Don't invest in RMIL again. Find something else. If you think this is rough, waht do you think will happen with RMIL at $6??? How are you going to feel when RMIL is trading in December?? Rashid

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (14031)	11/5/1997 11:58:00 PM
From: HRAKA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

And did the SEC tell them they were gonna shut them down? The SEC wouldn't tell me crap when I called. Said they couldn't. Just ask Mr. Kugler, they're not allowed to. Sincerely, Hraka

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (14031)	11/6/1997 12:38:00 AM
From: MZUBOZ	Respond to of 55532

Matty, I was involved with a stock that (even if everything Mork says about RMIL were true) would make this seem like a Sunday School picnic. There were complaints galore by investors. While I sold at about an eighty percent loss, I still go back to the thread to see if anything is going on. Keep in mind that this is what someone else recently posted. Their complaint was that they had called the SEC to find out what was going on with the investigation and the agent told them that it was against procedure to comment on an ongoing investigation. This person had no reason (IMO) to lie about this, after all he was compaining about it. So, my question is how likely is it that the SEC would give out to Mork such sensitive information as to a date that trading would be halted? Think about the source and what he potentially has to gain from making people believe that a halt is imminent. Doug M (as in you don't have to call me sir)