SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (190971)5/4/2010 9:26:16 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 362298
 
History's Mad Hatters
by Steve Fraser and Joshua B. Freeman
On a winter’s day in Boston in 1773, a rally of thousands at Faneuil Hall to protest a new British colonial tax levied on tea turned into an iconic moment in the pre-history of the American Revolution. Some of the demonstrators -- Sons of Liberty, they called themselves -- left the hall and boarded the Dartmouth, a ship carrying tea, and dumped it overboard.
One of the oddest features of the Boston Tea Party, from which our current crop of Tea Party populists draw their inspiration, is that a number of those long-ago guerilla activists dressed up as Mohawk Indians, venting their anger by emitting Indian war cries, and carrying tomahawks to slice open the bags of tea. This masquerade captured a fundamental ambivalence that has characterized populist risings ever since. After all, if in late eighteenth century America, the Indian already functioned as a symbol of an oppressed people and so proved suitable for use by others who felt themselves put upon, it was also the case that the ancestors of those Boston patriots had managed to exterminate a goodly portion of the region’s Native American population in pursuit of their own self-aggrandizement.
Today’s Tea Party movement, like so many of its “populist” predecessors, is a house of contradiction, a bewildering network of crosscutting political emotions, ideas, and institutions. What connects it powerfully to a populist past stretching all the way back to Boston Harbor is, however, a sense of violation: “Don’t Tread on Me.” ...

energybulletin.net



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (190971)5/4/2010 9:35:33 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 362298
 
Now, The Rache drove from NO to Baton Rouge, and back. Considering the oil cost of refining the gas she used, did she burn a barrel today? Fish die to satisfy her travel jones.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (190971)5/4/2010 9:37:19 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362298
 
I reject that.

Rachel needed to know how bad the oil poisen will be. Someone needs to report that stuff and they need to see it first hand to do it correctly.!

Rachel Maddow is the primary link to the modern intelligent woman. She is telling them what is going on and what they should do. From an informed honest person.

That is the best use of her time and oil-lol!