SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (73688)5/5/2010 6:49:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 149317
 
Big Govt failed on this disaster. Shall we count the ways?



To: koan who wrote (73688)5/5/2010 7:11:02 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

While Oil Slick Spread, Interior Department Chief of Staff Rafted with Wife on "Work-Focused" Trip in Grand Canyon
May 05, 2010 5:47 PM

PrintRSSSHARE:EmailMore
Though his agency was charged with coordinating the federal response to the major oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Department of the Interior chief of staff Tom Strickland was in the Grand Canyon with his wife last week participating in activities that included white-water rafting, ABC News has learned.

Other leaders of the Interior Department were focused on the Gulf, joined by other agencies and literally thousands of other employees. But Strickland’s participation in a trip that administration officials insisted was “work-focused” raised eyebrows among other Obama administration officials and even within even his own department, sources told ABC News.

Strickland, who also serves as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, was in the Grand Canyon with his wife Beth for a total of three days, including one day of rafting. Beth Strickland paid her own way, Obama administration officials said.

The Stricklands departed for the Grand Canyon three days after the leaks in the Deepwater Horizon pipeline were discovered. Ultimately, after the government realized that the spill was worse than had been previously thought, officials decided that Strickland was needed in the Gulf so Strickland was taken out of the Grand Canyon by a National Park Service helicopter.

One government official, asking for anonymity because of the political sensitivities involved, told ABC News that some Interior Department employees thought it was “irresponsible” for Strickland to have gone on the trip, given the crisis in the Gulf, which was fully apparent at the time he departed for the Grand Canyon.

When asked about Strickland’s trip, Interior Department press secretary Kendra Barkoff told ABC News that “the federal government has been all over this issue from day one in a unified coordinated response.”

Barkoff said that Secretary Salazar deputized Deputy Secretary of the Interior David Hayes “to be the point person on this issue and from the morning after the explosion from the time he got to New Orleans he has been working on this non-stop with the help of other people in the Interior Department as well as other agencies involved.”

An administration source says that Strickland’s trip to the Grand Canyon was work-focused. He was with the director of the National Park Service, Jonathan Jarvis, and Grand Canyon National Park Superintendant Steve Martin, the source said, and they discussed matters such as river flows, beach erosion, humpback chub, tamarisk control, overflights, safety, motor boats, and wilderness management.

Strickland is Salazar’s chief of staff as well as the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, having been confirmed to the latter position on April 30, 2009.

When asked during his Senate confirmation hearings as to which job would take priority, Strickland was very clear to the members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Energy and Natural Resource Committee: “My first priority will be the responsibilities of this assistant secretary position, and we are staffing the personal operation of the Secretary with that in mind,” he said.

Strickland’s deputy chief of staff, Renee Stone, “is going to take most of the responsibilities of the chief of staff day-to-day,” he testified.

The White House has aggressively pushed back on any notions that the federal government did not immediately respond to the crisis, providing today a detailed timeline indicating the day by day response in terms of the total numbers of response vessels, feet of boom deployed, oily water recovered, and overall personnel responding, among other measures.

That timeline, however, might raise even more questions as to why the Assistant Secretary in charge of fish and wildlife -- not to mention the Interior Department chief of staff -- didn’t reconsider the timeliness of his trip to the Grand Canyon with his wife, however work-focused.

The explosion at Deepwater Horizon was on April 20, and Hayes and Barkoff arrived in the Gulf the next day.

On Saturday April 24, the first oil leaks were discovered.

On Tuesday, April 27, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced that his department along with the Department of Homeland Security would launch an investigation into the Deepwater Horizon Incident. Salazar pledged “every resource we can to support the massive response effort underway at the Deepwater Horizon.”

Strickland and his wife arrived in the Grand Canyon that night.

The day before his travel, the US Fish and Wildlife Service began working with the Coast Guard to identify high-priority national wildlife refuges to be shielded with boom. More than one thousand overall personnel had been deployed to the region.

By Thursday, April 29, the fact that Strickland was not one of those personnel became sufficient issue that he tried to leave the Grand Canyon. The night before, the federal government updated its assessment that 1,000 barrels of oil a day were leaking into the Gulf, judging the spillage to be five times that. A National Park Service helicopter was flown in to remove him from the Grand Canyon so he could travel to the Gulf of Mexico to help with the federal response to the oil slick.

As Strickland made his way to New Orleans that Thursday, April 29, President Obama first addressed the oil slick in public, saying his "administration will continue to use every single available resource at our disposal, including potentially the Department of Defense, to address the incident."

A former U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado, Strickland ran unsuccessfully for the US Senate in 1996 and 2002.

On January 22, 2009, Salazar said that at the department he and Strickland – as a former US Attorney and a former Attorney General, respectively – “will hold people accountable. We will expect to be held accountable.”

-jpt

May 5, 2010 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (84)



To: koan who wrote (73688)5/5/2010 7:22:12 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 149317
 
U.S. exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study
washingtonpost.com
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely.

The decision by the department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 -- and BP's lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions -- show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf.

Rethinking the rules

Now, environmentalists and some key senators are calling for a reassessment of safety requirements for offshore drilling.

cont...



To: koan who wrote (73688)5/6/2010 5:12:45 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
BP Spills Promises More Easily Than It Keeps Them:

Commentary by Ann Woolner

May 5 (Bloomberg) -- As thousands of gallons of crude oil undulated toward the five-state Gulf of Mexico coastline earlier this week, BP Plc’s chief executive assured shrimpers, fisherman and everyone else that his company takes full responsibility for the cleanup and any damages the spill inflicts.

If that pledge turns out like BP’s promise to fix hazards that set off a deadly 2005 Texas refinery explosion, then Louisiana fishermen should be considering another line of work, another way of life.

If the company is as helpful to those the Gulf disaster hurts as Exxon Mobil was to victims of the Exxon Valdez’s 11 million-gallon spill in Alaska, then BP will spend two decades in court fighting damage claims until it finds a court that will give it a break.

Oh, and don’t expect marine life to fully recover within the next 20 years. In Alaska’s Prince William Sound, some 23,000 gallons of toxic oil remain on its beaches, and oil gobules are still found in its waters. Fish and fowl have yet to return to pre-spill levels.

Whether the Deepwater Horizon explosion off the Louisiana coast last month will turn out to be more or less calamitous than Exxon Valdez’s grounding is too soon to tell. My guess is more. We do know it has already been deadly and that thousands of gallons of crude have been gushing into the water every day for two weeks with no clear way to stop it.

If fixing it costs a fraction of some predictions, which range into the tens of billions of dollars, BP’s own record makes it unlikely the company will make good on its promises.

Multiple Hazards

In a 2005 settlement with the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, BP pledged to fix the multiple hazards that exploded part of its Texas City refinery and killed 15 people.

Four years later, OSHA alleged more than 700 safety breaches, hundreds of them violations of the 2005 agreement, and proposed a record $87.4 million fine.

BP says it’s been working as hard as it can to make the refinery safe and is appealing the OSHA findings.

That BP’s promises to do the right thing have fallen short should come as no surprise.

A corroded BP pipeline spilled more than 250,000 gallons of crude into Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay in 2006, followed by a second spill a few months later, which shut down the operation.

Dumping Waste

In 2000, BP admitted dumping hazardous wastes onto Alaska’s North Slope. In 2001 it vowed to clean up air emitted from eight of its U.S. refineries in a settlement with the Justice Department over Clean Air Act violations. And yet the Environmental Protection Agency cited one of those plants, in Indiana, for polluting the air again in 2007.

The company has been prosecuted for environmental crimes time and again. It has been sued by people who lost family members to BP’s carelessness and by workers hurt or sickened.

Each time BP executives are so very sorry. Each time they promise to install safety measures and to monitor the result and to never ever do such a thing again. And then it happens again.

BP gets green points for its investment in alternative, renewable energy sources. But that can’t make up for its dismal safety and environmental record at its other plants.

Hayward’s Tenure

It isn’t fair to lay all of BP’s shameful history at the feet of Tony Hayward, who became chief executive in 2007. He has demonstrated a willingness to take safety and environmental concerns seriously, however short the effort at Texas City.

Hayward got the top job after running BP’s U.S. operations, a stint that began at essentially the same moment the pipeline break at Prudhoe Bay was found.

“That first week was probably the most difficult in my career,” Hayward told Fortune magazine in 2006. He surely wishes that were still true.

As difficult as the past two weeks have been, he won’t get a rest after the Gulf leaks are plugged. Then he will have to show that he and his company will, at long last, make good on their promises to make things right after they have gone so very, very wrong. Again.

--Editors: Jim Rubin, Steven Gittelson.

To contact the writer of this column: Ann Woolner in Atlanta at awoolner@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this column: James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net