SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73720)5/6/2010 1:19:35 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
"increasing the taxes on the profits from oil thereby"
You know how dumb that is? Exxon is like the 15th largest oil company in the world. All the ones ahead of it are foreign nationals, and you can't tax them. You cripple American companies, you send even more money overseas, and you do nothing to kill demand.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73720)5/6/2010 1:38:16 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Groundhog Day for Oil

opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com

By TIMOTHY EGAN

May 5, 2010, 9:00 pm

Wish it weren’t so, but I fear my lasting memory of many trips to Prince William Sound will be of hunched-over workers with toothbrushes, trying to scrub black tar from shivering birds and sea-worn rocks in the Alaska spring of 1989.

All the images were staggering: The birds looked lost and stunned, their coats of warmth matted black, their wings greased by hydrocarbons that would eventually kill most of them. The inlets of that most Edenic of sheltered seas had a sickening sheen, with a smell that made you nauseated and stayed with you through sleepless nights. Harder still was the sight of fishermen — tough, independent, weather-callused men — weeping for their loss.

But what stayed with me were those hundreds of workers with toothbrushes. They would labor all day, and maybe clean a rock or two — Sisyphus on the sound. After a while it was all public relations theater paid for by Exxon,

Here now is the sad replay in the Gulf of Mexico, with that life-killing choreography. Then, as today, an oil company deployed booms and dispersants, tried to buy off fishermen with quicky legal settlements, and made resolute promises about restoration and doing the right thing.

In Alaska, we saw how that turned out: after nearly two decades of legal foot-dragging, Exxon got exactly what it wanted: a Supreme Court that consistently backs the powerful and well-connected reduced punitive damages from $2.5 billion to $500 million — in a good year, just a single week’s profit for the company.

It’s a waste of hope to wish that BP will be any more responsible or effective than Exxon was. And maybe it’s not their fault, in one sense: oil spills are acts of blunt-force trauma, and the remedies for cleanup remain primitive. The toothbrush brigade will soon be out, trying to save those nesting brown pelicans, symbols of a delta made rich by sediment carried from the Heartland.

The immediate reactions — a pause to President Obama’s short-sighted plan to open vast areas of coastal waters to offshore drilling, and maybe a requirement for automatic shutoff valves on deepwater wells — will make most of us forget and move on. The summer driving season is just around the corner and no one wants to pay more than $3 a gallon for gas.

On energy, amnesia is the American way. Things lumber along, 300-million-year-old fossil fuels are pulled from deep inside the kingdoms of desert despots and shipped to our shores. It’s slow-motion suicide, of sorts, to the planet — and I’m no worse or better than anyone else who uses oil for everyday comforts — but we don’t see the wounds until a spill brings it all home.

Suddenly, alarms are sounded. Brows are furrowed. Promises are made. This time, with fears that the Gulf spill will be even larger than the one in Alaska, lessons will be learned, yesiree. But soon enough, we’ll go back to planting trees on Earth Day, feeling good about recycling — Hooray for us! We’re green and cool — while resuming the old routine. That is: a nation with five percent of the earth’s population consuming about 23 percent of the world’s oil output, glug, glug, glug.

Not all hope has to be sworn off. We can wish that “drill, baby, drill” will be retired as a slogan and as the energy policy of one party. When crowds of mindless zealots shouted those three words at campaign rallies headed by Sarah Palin — whose husband was once a real fisherman in Alaska — I thought of Homer Simpson calling for more beer while thinking it was a good way to lose weight.

Here was a chant, inspired by arsonists and rioters in the 1960s, posing as a political solution. The only thing more mindless than “drill, baby, drill” was the latest self-serving distraction to spill from Newt Gingrich’s bag of cynical ideas. He called his movement: Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less. Because, of course, it’s all pain-free, and very uncomplicated.

If you go on Gingrich’s Web site, you can still sign a petition demanding more drilling — now! — and through links, buy a t-shirt with the same brain-dead slogan. And then there’s also a curious last-minute call by Gingrich for, um, an independent investigation into the, uh . . . tragic oil spill in the gulf.

He’s right on two points. We can drill here. We can drill now. But pay less? No, we always pay more, though the full tab takes a while to show.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73720)5/6/2010 9:31:12 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 149317
 
Long-Term Unemployment: 80 Percent Of People Jobless Last Summer Still Out Of Work
news.yahoo.com

Arthur Delaney – Tue May 4, 2:21 pm ET
Just one in five people who were out of work last summer have found jobs since then.
Of more than a thousand unemployed people surveyed by Rutgers University researchers last August, just 21 percent had landed a job by March, a followup survey reveals. Two-thirds remained "unemployed" according to the government's definition -- the rest gave up looking for work altogether, either going to school or retiring early.
"It's a pretty grim study," said Cliff Zukin, one of the authors of the report at the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers.
Here's how this grim finding looks graphically:

Of the people who found work, only 13 percent found full-time jobs, and 61 percent said their new gig was just "something to get you by while you look for something better."
Seventy percent have been looking for work for longer than six months, the survey found -- up from 48 percent in the summer. (In March, the number of people out of work for that length of time increased by 414,000 month to 6.5 million, representing 44.1 percent of all unemployed.)
To cope, 70 percent dipped into retirement funds, 56 percent borrowed money from family or friends and 45 percent turned to credit cards. Forty-two percent skimped on medical care, 20 percent moved in with family or friends and 18 percent visited a soup kitchen.
"The cushion's completely gone," said Zukin. "I think we're looking at more cutting the core... It's a much deeper economic gash this time."
But while the employment situation has worsened, feelings have muted. In August, the intensity of people's distress was the salient thing. For instance, 79 percent of the unemployed described themselves as "stressed" -- that number dropped to 49 percent in March. There was a similar drop in people describing themselves as depressed, anxious, helpless, angry, hopeless, hopeful or motivated.
"My guess is that it's harder to sustain that emotion, which is based on upheaval, as it becomes normal to you," said Zukin (who stressed that he is not a psychologist). "So they're dealing with it better. Being unplugged for a long time makes you make your piece with it."
Long-term unemployment is even worse for people over 50, only 12 percent of whom found jobs since August. One of the survey respondents explained a common view of jobless folks over 50: age discrimination is to blame.
"Although there is nowhere on a CV/resume that you state your age, employers can tell how many years you have worked," the person wrote. "I have been interviewed for positions requiring experience by managers more than half my age, and they can barely contain their disdain -- despite the fact that my work experience is far greater than theirs."
Unemployment for people over 55 has surged by 331 percent over the past decade, according to the AARP. Age-discrimination complaints to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office have been higher since the start of the current recession than in any previous two-year period.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73720)5/6/2010 9:47:28 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 149317
 
Complicit Agents of Imperial Crimes
Wednesday 05 May 2010
by: Francis Shor, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
truthout.org
What would you do if you knew that a large contingent of well-armed gang members were planning to assault Los Angeles, inflicting massive death and mayhem on innocent civilians? Furthermore, what if those gang members could be linked to you through financial support you had given to their paymasters?

Sounds preposterous? Only consider that there are gang members, called Special Forces, trained by the Pentagon, paid for by US citizens and sent into battle by an imperial president and Washington policymakers, who are now planning to attack Kandahar, the second largest city in Afghanistan. Some of those Special Forces may have been part of the February 2010 night raid that murdered two pregnant women and one young girl and then tried to cover up their crime. Perhaps, those pilots preparing to bomb Kandahar may be the same ones who carried out earlier and repeated attacks on wedding parties throughout Afghanistan, resulting in the death of hundreds of civilian celebrants.

Maybe those horrific deaths, not captured on video and underreported in the American corporate media, seem too remote and abstract. On the other hand, now that millions of US citizens have seen the actual footage, thanks to WikiLeaks, of the July 12, 2007, Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed 12 civilians, including two employees of Reuters news agency, how will the outrage be mobilized? Beyond the calls for an independent investigation of this incident, what will be our individual and collective response?

Will the citizens of St. Louis march en masse on Boeing Defense, Space and Security where the Apache helicopter is produced? Will a Catholic bishop from St. Louis take a lesson from Bishop Matthiesen of Amarillo, Texas, and threaten excommunication to Boeing workers, as did Matthiesen in the early 1980s to those who worked in a nearby nuclear bomb facility. Will Boeing workers demand an end to war production and conversion to green sustainable products?

Will the corporate executives of Alliant Techsystems in Minneapolis stop manufacturing the M230 30 millimeter chain gun that spewed its projectiles into that crowd of unarmed men from the Apache helicopter that sweltering July day in 2007? Certainly, the previous owners of Alliant, Honeywell, faced constant and militant demonstrations at their corporate offices during the late 1960s and early 1970s as a consequence of their manufacturing of the anti-personnel fragmentation bombs used by the Pentagon in its indiscriminate strikes throughout Southeast Asia.

Corporate executives, church leaders, line workers and tax-paying citizens are all part of the complicit chain that drives the imperial war machine. Maybe there are true believers among them who are blinded by self-interest and false patriotism. However, among the skeptics and opponents there seems to be a kind of psychic numbing, a disconnectedness that afflicts the capacity to take action. Ironically, the very people who assume that their connections in the virtual world translate automatically into real political opposition may be fooling themselves about their efficacy as anti-war opponents.

Let's face it: we are all now part of a militarized matrix. Desensitized by aggressive and racist video games, and facing a precarious future, young men and women join the military in the belief that their service will be rewarded, only to be confronted with what social psychologist Tracy Xavier Karner calls a "militarization of feeling." Acting out of that feeling and with a hair-trigger mentality, many of these soldiers can rationalize killing even women and children. Although a few refuse to be instruments of imperial murder and others return to civilian life ready to denounce what they were forced to do, too many become victims themselves, either physically or psychologically.

Meanwhile, US citizens are bombarded with both heavy-handed and subtle messages that reinforce the false belief these soldiers are "our" troops and not the imperial instruments designed by the Pentagon. Whether at sporting events or ads in movie theaters and on television, the solemn link between the military and the citizenry is hammered home. Perhaps, one reason that the Pentagon tries to do everything in its power to deny and then suppress pictures and stories, like those exposed on WikiLeaks, is because they make that link more tenuous.

On the other hand, as long as the citizenry does nothing to translate its outrage into real-world action, the daily outrages perpetrated in our name in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other sites of US military intervention will continue. As April 15 approaches, we should all remember that almost half of our federal tax dollars for discretionary funding goes to military-related expenditures. With Congress soon to vote on a supplemental bill for 33 billion dollars more for the war in Afghanistan, we must mount an organized campaign at every level to raise the political cost to prosecute the war. We must find a way to act both individually and collectively to stop being complicit agents of imperial crimes.