Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ICE who wrote (2784)	11/6/1997 1:34:00 PM
From: violetta martinez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Ice, is it an over-simplification to say you don't believe BH will produce a mine? Thanks for the above info ,just the same! Have you bought any ACA for the long term? Cheers, Violetta

To: ICE who wrote (2784)	11/6/1997 8:55:00 PM
From: Phoenix	Respond to of 7966

ICE: You say that the crater facies material has been altered and this makes it difficult to classify. But, I think that if Ashton found the results of their analysis ambiguous - they would have said so and not referred to the material as "kimberlite". Therefore I'll continue to believe that it is kimberlite as opposed to lamproite. In terms of whether BH should be classified as a "craton" or not, the proof is in the pudding. We know we have pipes that have passed though the diamond inclusion field, because we have diamonds. And we have been told that they are "clear". I have previously summarised why I'm long on this play so I won't repeat myself here. Anyway, thanks for your point of view, but I remain very looooong on this one. Cheers! P.