SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (565026)5/6/2010 7:32:43 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations  Respond to of 1577133
 
Bentway, > Will "Los Lakers" follow? Lotsa beaners in LA!

More racism from the basement dweller ...

Tenchusatsu



To: bentway who wrote (565026)5/7/2010 7:56:11 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1577133
 
NAACP Opposes Bill To Outlaw Racially Motivated Abortions!

“The great irony is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of” - Dr. Alveda King, niece of slain civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Ironically, the NAACP is showing its true colors here. Not black. Not colored. But a deep blue. As in liberal. The National Organization of Women (NOW) is not pro-women but rather pro-liberal women. Similarly, the NAACP is not the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People but rather the National Association for the Advancement of liberal Colored People. The AARP isn't really for seniors either. They are yet another satellite of the liberal movement and thus the Democrat Party. In fact, they threw seniors under the bus simply because they can make a profit selling supplemental insurance to seniors who will be denied care when their medicare will deny treatment based on the $500 million cut in the Obamacare bill. Organizations like these and many others show their true colors when they viciously attack those that they proclaim to support, and issues . The NAACP viciously attacked Clarence Thomas when he went up for the SCOTUS. And NOW viciously attacked Sarah Palin when she was announced to be the VP candidate of McCain. Further along this thread is the issues these organizations support.

In Georgia, a bill was introduced that would make it illegal to perform and abortion simply because of the race of the baby. Besides personhood amendments in states like Colorado and Nebraska, Oklahoma has specifically banned abortions based on gender. Gender-based abortion has led to a societal time-bomb in places like China (Nepal is following that lead) that now has a shortage of 35 million females as a result. So banning abortion based on gender is the next frontier of restrictions on what should be outright unconstitutional action anyway (abortion violates equal protection rights of the baby under the 14th amendment of the US Constitution). Fact is that organizations like Planned Parenthood were set up specifically to eradicate the black race. In Detroit, 81% black, writers in the MSM are lamenting the low birth rate and ignorant of the number of abortions there (Irony: Pro-abort Rochelle Riley laments low birth rate in Detroit putting the city at risk). Last November I wrote this post that basically tells you why the racial angle is being considered in regards to abortion: Abortion Is The New Racism: Kills More Black Americans Than the Seven Leading Causes of Death - COMBINED

With that backdrop, John Rosenberg of the blog discriminations, IMO the one person that formulates the most complete, logical arguments regarding discrimination that I have ever read, gets into the Georgia bill and the NAACP:

...last winter Georgia Right to Life put up billboards all over the state claiming that black children are an “endangered species, ” and SB 529 was introduced, a bill that made it a criminal offense to perform an abortion

(2) With the intent to prevent an unborn child from being born based upon the race, color, or gender of the unborn child or the race or color of either parent of that unborn child; (3) With the actual knowledge that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion with the intent to prevent an unborn child from being born based upon the race, color, or gender of the unborn child or the race or color of either parent of that unborn child;.

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and the Georgia NAACP endorsed the bill, but now the NAACP has withdrawn its support. Edward DuBose, chapter president, issued a statement explaining the NAACP reversal:

Earlier this month, the Georgia NAACP submitted a letter to support Senate Bill 529. We now fully understand the intention of this legislation and wish to retract our support for it.
At the time, we were of the understanding that this bill would work to benefit the women in our community. However, after many conversations with membership and constituents, we now realize that this is nothing more than using women’s health as a political tool.

Women of color in Georgia need more than divisive messages and deserve better access to health care.

John doesn't see how "how prohibiting racially motivated abortions is “a divisive message.” " Nor do I. John also isn't sure that "there actually were any abortions performed with a race-based intent," but I beg to differ on this one point. Organizations like Planned Parenthood were specifically tasked with aborting what they considered to be "undesirables," and the black population was right in their cross-hairs. Here in Michigan, Planned Parenthood has strategically located their butcher shops in Detroit, Warren, Jackson, Lansing, East Lansing, Livonia, Ypsilanti, and are now eyeballing Pontiac. All of these locations are close to large minority populations. Funny that you never see their "health care" facilities in affluent suburbs. You don't have to go too far back in historical research to learn that Planned Parenthood was set up by Margaret Sanger, a eugenicist and disciple of the false god Molech, for the express purpose of elimination of what she considered "undesireables," a point recently admitted to by one Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The black community was target numero uno for Sanger:

Thus the intent in the bigger scale of things. Speaking of, recall that January 22, 1972 is the day where our very own Supreme Court took it upon itself to legislate murder-on-demand into law out of whole cloth. Never mind that that in itself is unconstitutional. Indeed, the Declaration of Independence points to life as the highest of unalienable rights. That decision has so poisoned the country that the appointment of SCOTUS justices now must go through a Roe v Wade litmus test.

Now the supremes have made other egregious decisions in the past when a majority of the court is packed with activists. Even so, Roe v Wade has resulted in the death of more than 50 million children (the population of the U.S. would be about 400-425 million right now had it not been for RvW, and we probably would have a better economy and wouldn't be as worried about the imminent collapse of social security and Medicare). Some of those people may have found a cure for cancer, Alzheimer's disease, cheap alternative energy, or other contributions to humanity large and small. Who's to know if a Mozart or Bach, Michelangelo or Shakespeare, or the next Martin Luther King Jr., were conceived but butchered. Torn apart limb from limb or burned to death with chemicals. Never had a chance. No matter life's circumstances, always imagine the possibilities:

theblogprof.blogspot.com



To: bentway who wrote (565026)5/7/2010 9:41:41 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1577133
 
only liberals watch NBA basketball, to many thugs for conservatives, but libs love black thugs, must be a cultural thing