Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (122519)	5/7/2010 5:56:32 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	1 Recommendation Respond to of 132070

>>No, but I happened to be watching the Twin Towers fall on t.v. (I know, it was all paid actors done on a Hollywood set.)<< nobody has ever said that. funny, you have time to make irrelevant stuff up, but no time to address the real issues... 1. building 7 was reported as fallen by fire 20 minutes before it fell - how did they know it was going to fall 20 minutes before it fell "unexpectedly" due to fire? 2. NIST admits building 7 fell evenly at free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds. that's equivalent to vaporizing over 2 full floors across the entire width and depth of the building simultaneously. what do these real issues have to do with paid actors? >>There were claims of several buildings collapsing way before they did because the smoke kept visibility bad and people were in a panic.<< building 7 fell a good 7 hours after the planes hit. look at the video - the skies are pretty clear by the time it fell. i can clearly see WTC 7 in the background. they described the building accurately, so they didn't misspeak. these are all fact. don't believe me, believe the video. so, your answer is not reasonable given the actual facts. nobody was confused due to smoke that didn't exist for hours before WTC 7 fell. back to the drawing board. >> also heard the phone call from the jet that crashed. And I had friends working at the Pentagon. Does anyone really think all of those airline people, Pentagon workers, World Trade Center tenants, etc. would make up this stuff? Strange things happen during disasters.<< you may or may not have heard the phone call - you have faith that big brother is offering up accurate information. the same big brother that wanted to assassinate americans in operations northwoods and the same government that lied about the gulf of tonkin attack in order to draft civilians and send them to die - oh, and run up the debt and spend lots of military money. i don't know if they are real or not. i also don't believe that the whole pentagon knew they were going to blow building 7 up. that's why they run drills at the same time they do these false flag attacks - the good pentagon and other workers don't intervene in the confusion of thinking that it is a drill. this same drill theme played out on the 7/7/07 attacks. the exact day, the exact locations of all the attacks - they ran drills of, well, that kind of attack. >>As far as the terrorist being an intelligence asset, this is the name of the game. As a former worker on the fringes of that stuff, you want to turn someone on the inside and they want to show a false flag on the inside. That's the way it's played.<< so the fbi builds the bomb and lets it explode and kill six americans? that's how it works? or they usher in a known terrorist sympathizer (his dad called the FBI or CIA and patrick kennedy wanted to strip his visa - but was over ruled) the underwear bomber and let him try and blow up a plane? oooh, need naked body scanners and a new level of police state to go with the major network black out of the news our intelligence was in knee deep with the underwear bomber. btw, the big brother lied about their involvement for about a month. they publicly accused an attorney witness of lying when he simply told the truth - they could have ruined his business for telling the truth. but this is america - and you are free not to care about right and wrong and tyranny inflicted on others for telling the truth. >>I always mock the conspiracies because they are always so wild and so fervently believed by the conspiracy buffs. Someday they may be right on one of them.<< i think the problem is you mock before you investigate and seriously ponder something. your mind is made up ahead of the evidence. assuming they didn't blow the buildings up... then someone must've made a mistake and something must've caused that mistake. there was smoke that day - maybe that was it. the problem is, there was no dense smoke at the time WTC 7 fell - or an hour or more before it was "pulled." investigation would've shown that explanation to be flat as a doughless pancake. yet you believe an explanation that doesn't hold up to the facts because you've predetermined the answer. and you still haven't explained how fires can vaporize more than 2 floors simultaneously (the entire floors, all the way across and all the way through the back of the building - free fall acceleration means NOTHING is there to offer resistance (scientific fact) and the building fell evenly for that 2 second period (watch the video for proof). don't feel bad in failure, NIST admitted it wasn't possible while trying to hide the free fall acceleration by averaging a 5 second time frame and then, when forced to fess up, simply stated this result was "consistent" with the NIST findings with no further explanation. yet the magic, zig, zagging bullet is intelligent to believe? -lol- you seem to have no problem believing the absurd as long as big brother tells you to do it. now, how did over 2 floors of WTC vaporize instantaneously due to fires primarily on one side of the building? how did WTC 7 fall "unexpectedly" in relatively clear skies, 7 hours after the planes hit, 20 minutes AFTER it was reported to fallen on the BBC? oh, and operation northwoods and the gulf of tonkin aren't conspiracies, but documented facts. as is the fbi telling the bad guys how to build the bomb and letting them explode it - even against the admonition of their inside mole running the operation. fact. mumbai head bad guy tied to US intelligence. which begs the question - why do we need to give up our rights and go through naked body scanners when the government already knows who the bad guys are and sit back while they commit their crimes?