SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (83683)5/9/2010 9:05:07 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
More on Obama's incompetence.

Afghanistan and Israel: Mere Incompetence?

By Jennifer Rubin on Contentions (From LindyBill)

It's sometimes difficult to comprehend just how incompetent the Obama national-security team is. This report gives us a peek:

>>>The Obama administration, after 16 months of treating President Hamid Karzai with what some U.S. officials called "tough love," will welcome the Afghan leader Monday with all the trappings of a head of state, in what officials said is the start of a new, more pragmatic approach.

The shift, backed by the Pentagon and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, follows concerns that repeated public criticism of Mr. Karzai, particularly of his commitment to anticorruption efforts, was backfiring, leading the mercurial leader to lash out and undermining U.S. public support for the war. …

U.S. officials said the transition from last month's bitter tenor to next week's red carpet is intentional. "The main objective of the trip is to repair the damage" caused by the war of words, says a U.S. official familiar with planning for the visit.

Gen. David Petraeus, who oversees the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said public disputes between Mr. Karzai and administration officials "play into the hands of our enemies," and that the approach had been jettisoned in favor of sustained outreach to the Afghan leader.<<<

Did no one in the White House realize this before the administration went publicly ballistic with a crucial wartime ally? Apparently not:

>>>In interviews, some U.S. officials said there is growing acknowledgment within the administration that the very public criticism of Mr. Karzai's failings as a leader made the Afghan president more suspicious of American intentions.

"I think we all realized we had gotten ourselves right to the edge of the cliff about a month and a half ago, and there was nowhere to go but jump off the cliff, and that was too scary for everybody," said a former senior U.S. official who has discussed the visit with top officials in both governments.<<<

One must ask whether anyone realized they were jumping off the cliff with Israel, as well. After all, don't the scream-athons with Bibi, the "condemnations," and the series of demands from the Obama team for more and more unilateral Israeli concessions "play into the hands" of enemies of Israel and the United States? You'd think there would be key advisers who'd point that out as well. If there are, Obama isn't listening to them.

There are two possibilities in these scenarios: total incompetence and mendacity. In the case of Afghanistan, the administration more or less has gotten the policy right; it's the executions that has been clumsy. In the case of Israel, however, the administration's obvious animus toward Bibi and its infatuation with the Palestinian narrative suggest the latter is at play. Their charm offensive is meant to suggest the problem has been a lack of tact with American Jewry and a failure to make clear how really, madly, honestly, truly the administration is devoted to Israel. But unlike Afghanistan, the administration in the case of Israel is wedded to disastrous policies (e.g., distancing ourselves from Israel, obsessing on a stalemated "peace process," irresoluteness toward Iran, indifference on Muslim human-rights abusers). Until all of that changes or there is a new Oval Office occupant, Israel remains imperiled.