Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (565416)	5/10/2010 1:02:17 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577162

>If she is not more liberal than Stevens, then the Court stays the same. If she's to his right, then it moves a bit to the right. >However, she's a woman out of Princeton and Harvard. I think she will trend more liberal over time. Stereotypes... >True. But its the liberal issue most in danger at the present time. Not really. Many of the issues dealing with corporations are a lot bigger right now. Net neutrality is one. Reeling back Citizens United, which is the worst decision of our time, is another. >More importantly, this is Obama's bread and butter......the Constitution and the Court. His picks should be some of the best this country has seen. Sotomayor was OK. Nothing great. Kagan is OK. Nothing great. There's no Thurgood Marshall or Brandeis or Brennan in the crowd. He may get one more pick. I don't know why everyone on both sides expects Obama to make liberal decisions. He has so little history of that. He's Clinton without the wandering dick. -Z