Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (247602)	5/10/2010 4:45:36 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

In most fields, the more brilliant/proficient you are, the FASTER you get work done. In law the more proficient you are, the SLOWER you get work done, i.e, more billable hours. I'm sure you know this, they teach it in the first year I understand.....<G?>

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (247602)	5/10/2010 10:05:32 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 306849

I don't think practicing law or being a judge is a requirement of the job. A law degree would really help with the legalize though. g

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (247602)	5/10/2010 10:29:32 PM
From: ChanceIs	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

RE: Kagan I was watching the news hour tonight. I swear that their is a conspiracy going on to keep the world from knowing what Kagan is all about. For example - is she against Roe vs Wade? All I hear is hoe sensitive she is and how she can "reach-out" to conservatives. Hey!!! The Dems get to appoint liberals, and the Pubs get to support conservatives. But they are keeping a super tight lid on Kagan. Suggests to me that she is a screaming liberal. One thing about not having been a judge is that there is record of decisions to document her attitudes. I think it is the strategic default equivalent of Supreme Court appointment process. For my taste, this business of keeping the military from recruiting JAGs from the Harvard Law campus says a lot. I have no problem with her working to change policy in the military or anywhere else....writing papers...giving speeches...attending rallies. Banning recruiters from campus!!!! Awfully heavy handed, presumptuous, self centered. dictatorial, etc. Imagine trying to get a promotion or tenure at Harvard Law if you didn't actively support her policies. BTW: Too many folks from Harvard w/o any real world experience. Much too cluby. Didn't Larry Summers work at Harvard? What does that tell you. ;-)