To: Gary R. Owens who wrote (14339 ) 11/6/1997 8:05:00 AM From: Ellen Respond to of 55532
All: For your reading pleasure while I'm still working on the nightly recap: To: michael d kugler (13777 ) From: FTJoe Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 9:27PM EST Reply #13787 of 14343 Michael, I don't know what to make of you anymore, here some of your past statements, tell me the one thing they have in common? They are all presented as FACT. You have come within a hairsbreadth of calling Morgan, Breton and Puhr con artists, but one talk with Mork, and you list everything he tells you as fact. Is that the due diligence you've been preaching we all should have, or is it taken as fact because it supports your opinion. As you've pointed out more than once, and is evident by Mork's actions, it is to his benefit to see this company fail. 1) May I ask why you are helping him in this effort? How the hell do you think that is going to look if this stuff hits the fan? Is it so important for you to be right that you will do everything in your power to sink the company as well? 2) If Mork doesn't have to cover and he's only short 100,000 shares, why all the antics? The posters who claim to not be affiliated with Mork, who have in fact, been proven to be just that. These people have posted material that by any stretch of the imagination, is not allowed on public fora. 3) Your such an expert on manipulation, doesn't having people who work for Mork, posing as something else, consitute manipulation? If so, why are you helping them? You are now, in my opinion, screwing with people's investments, you are no longer(and have not for a while) providing a fair representation of the negative aspects of this investment. Your comments: <Part of the reason for the screw up in the lawsuits is due to the name change. Mork now owns the name Olympus Ventures, now that Rocky Mountain International doesn't need it.> <The guy is upset at being bagged by Zapara, who promised to deliver 100,000 shares to him to cover the short. Mork says he was doing Zapara a favor, saying he has known Zapara for a long time. They play polo together at the Santa Barbara Polo Club.> <Why would he cover here. If it melts down entirely, he doesn't have to pay anything.> <Morgan's original defamation lawsuit was thrown out of court two days after he filed it, due to lack of jurisdiction.> <Mork doesn't have to cover his 100,000 share short position. He simplly has to come up with the margin to keep it open. He appears to have the wherewithal to do this for a long time, and he does not intend to close it out at these prices.> <The rules are different in Canada, which is where Mork is short. He doesn't have to cover, just keeping enough margin is enough.> <There is no short squeeze. The MM's don't have to cover either. If you all keep buying, the price will go up. But who will you sell it to? And who do you think is selling all the shares wheich you all bought over the past couple of days? Think about it.>