Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FTJoe who wrote (14340)	11/6/1997 8:11:00 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

All: To: michael d kugler (13781 ) From: Riley G Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 9:34PM EST Reply #13794 of 14345 As a LONG shareholder of over 20,000's in certificated form, I would like to hear your answer to this. Are you saying that Mork is short, and that there is a known unreported short position (interest) in the OTC RMIL market? Also, what is your intent as a broker in this forum? Riley G ------- To: GJC (13680 ) From: michael d kugler Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 9:20PM EST Reply #13781 of 13791 Zapara was brought in by Morgan and given stock. Mork told me he wanted to sell some of his stock and promised to deliver it to Mork after Mork had sold short for him. Then Zapara reneged on his deal to deliver to Mork and ostensibly sold his shares on the open market right after the Palco announcement drove the price up. That left Mork with a short which would have been covered at a big loss to Mork.

To: FTJoe who wrote (14340)	11/6/1997 8:14:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

All: To: michael d kugler (13647 ) From: Roo Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 9:37PM EST Reply #13798 of 14346 Saint Michael- Y'know, once upon a time I thought you were here to help small investors who may be naive to the ways of the penny market. Today I realize your motivation is a bit less altruistic and a bit more egotistical. Seems your proud and much lauded position of "fraud buster" is at stake here and you will stoop to anything to prove yourself right. As you have pointed out many times, you called fraud correctly at GIFS, and you called fraud correctly at SEXI... what an embarrassment to have made that call at RMIL and be wrong. You have stepped over the line however in the last two day's posts, and it is clear that your main (or perhaps only) interest is in protecting your fraud-busting reputation regardless of the consequences to others. How convenient it would be if the cartel heeded your call, made the "executive decision," and sold at this price that might "represent a decent profit." Your utter lack of concern for the consequences of that action is the flaw that exposes your very personal and very egotistical motives here. Just how many shares could the cartel unload before this stock would be trading under $.25 ? 200K? 500K?? (market always seems to go down a lot easier than it goes up don't you agree?) So let's say a few cartelers bail at the open. A few more smell the bail and drop their positions as well. By 10:30am the stock is below a buck, and by 11:00 it has bottomed at 15-19 cents. Now what do we have???? How about a positively jubilant fraud-busting Mike Kugler pointing to the morning's trading as "evidence" and loudly proclaiming his righteousness, and the rest of the investors looking on in stupefaction and conceding that you were right all along... A pretty pitiful return on YOUR investment wouldn't you say Mike??? (Not all the investments here are made with money). Well I've got a new motivation for holding onto my shares of RMIL, and that is a desire to prove you wrong that is as powerfull, obsessive, and irrational as your desire to prove yourself right! Have a nice day. -R#42