Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary R. Owens who wrote (14347)	11/6/1997 8:42:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

All: To: michael d kugler (13886 ) From: Riley G Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 10:57PM EST Reply #13921 of 14351 So you are saying that Mork and Zapara conspired the act in California, an act that is illegal to do in any of the 50 States. Mork shorts 100k RMIL shares in Canada and is left holding the bag (So to speak) becuase the other party bails on the deal. Doesn't hold water in my book. 1. Illegal act conspired in the USA. Though legal to do in Canada. 2. Act completed willfully by Mork. 3. Zapara backs out of ther deal. 4. Is there anything contractual on this deal. If so, were is the contract? 5. There still a large short position and I can count over 1.3 million known shorts in the RMIL market from my list alone. And I estimate the extra shares in the RMIL market to be betwween 2 and 5 million shares. call those Certificates and file those formal letters to the brokers and NASD demanding delivery. Riley G

To: Gary R. Owens who wrote (14347)	11/6/1997 8:47:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

All: To: michael d kugler (13883 ) From: Roo Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 11:01PM EST Reply #13932 of 14352 Sorry Mike, regardless of the "sexy shory squeeze" story (which I am fully prepared to take my losses on in the event of failure), I'm having a real problem with you- with your hypocritical position on the performance of Due Diligence (yeas must prove all beyond a reasonable doubt, yet nays must simply get someone's word for it)- with your blatantly obvious intent to kill this stock by convincing holders to sell (perhaps, just perhaps so Mork could cover his meager 100K short position in the least painful manner for him)- and with your poorly supported claims that you are here to help the weak-minded (or is it just your own fraud-busting reputation). But most significant I believe is your arrogant assertions that now is the time to sell with no regard for the impact this would have on other long investors or on naive and/or ignorant new investors who would be left holding the bag when the selloff is over. -R#42 Y'know, you used to be a pretty reasonable guy, and (dare I say it?) even respectable.