SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (4745)5/12/2010 1:33:21 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
Okay, you're backing away from ID .... good, but you'd be better off denouncing it as heresy.

-----------------------------------------------

<Nobody knowledgeable thinks that anymore.>

Right. Making your point incorrect (that it's current dogma).... which you've shown by your inability to show ONE biologist saying such.


I have not said that current dogma holds that cells are "bags of water". That position is the straw man you erected. The only thing I've said is that biology textbooks vastly understate the complexity of cells.

------------------------------------------

<But let's not imply they're consciously reasoning. Unless you have evidence of that.>

Those are words everyone, including scientists, need to define: "concious reasoning" for example, but intelligence and all that as well.


Got a written scientific source that says cells employ conscious reasoning?

-----------------------------------------

<Cells, otoh, maybe they do fit the robot paradigm better. If you have evidence otherwise, I'm open to it.>

Or we could say... if you have evidence cells are robotic, I"M open to it!


Wait a minute .... you've asserted cells reason and essentially possess free will .... I think that needs to be supported.

I don't need to provide evidence of no conscious reasoning, no free will possessing cells for your claim to prevail. The more extravagant claim should be defended.