SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 7:45:32 AM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
1. There was no way to blame it on George W. Bush.

A Flood of Inattention
By Tom Cox
tomcox.wordpress.com

Cumberland River near Ashland City, TN, in better days -- August, 2008
Ah, how nature can turn. The gentle, slow-moving Cumberland River and its tributaries have given us lots of comfort and beauty, and not a few catfish.

Last weekend (May 1 and 2, 2010), however, nature turned mean. A vast and unstoppable force, sometimes raging, and other times creeping, the Cumberland and its tributaries surged out of their banks and up miles of roads, in through thousands of front doors, stealing irreplaceable personal and public treasures, and destroying dreams and lives.

Flood water churns under the Ashland City bridge over the Cumberland, twenty feet higher than normal. 5/5/10

Riverview Restaurant/Campground, Ashland City, TN 5/5/10
There it met the water from the second day of rains flowing downhill, having saturated the surrounding ground to the point where it could absorb no more than a paved parking lot. Inconsequential creeks and streams became roaring whitewater monsters.

Take the most rain ever to fall in Nashville over 48 hours… and double it. At one point along the Cumberland, in better days, a relatively civilized river was a few hundred feet across. By Monday morning, after over a foot of rain, that same stretch of river had swollen to thousands of feet across, and it carried cars, livestock and whole buildings along at an astonishing pace. Structures that weren’t floated off their foundations were crushed under the weight and pressure of millions of tons of running water, pushing debris ahead like battering rams. Every crushed building, uprooted tree and floating car added to the mass that careened downstream, multiplying the flood’s destructive power.

As the flood waters recede – and they continue to recede, a week later — they leave behind mud, building materials, brush, dead things, an evil stench, uncatalogued contaminants and nightmarish memories that will last as long as the survivors.

The Army Corps of Engineers, which operates the system of dams, locks and generating sites along the Cumberland and other rivers in the region, had no experience to guide them in operating the flood gates and locks to best manage the water, because not since the completion of the system in the late ‘60s has so much rain fallen in so short a period. The best they could do for a few days was operate the system to keep the floods from destroying it, adding greatly to the surrounding destruction. That they did.

When I had time to watch national news, which was seldom, I was amazed at how little coverage was given to our situation. My amazement diminished when I thought about it.

I composed a “top-ten list” of reasons the lamestream media ignored this story:

10. Tennessee is a Red state. You could skip 9) through 1) now, and know all you need to know.

9. Al Gore didn’t call a press conference at his Nashville estate to blame the flooding on global warming.

8. People in Tennessee don’t sit around and wait for the gummint to give them a hand. They help themselves, and each other. No government dependency story, here, folks; move along!

7. New Orleans Progressive hack Ray Nagin is not the mayor of Nashville. Karl Dean is. Dean took personal responsibility for his city’s rescue and recovery, and was clearly in charge. No whining, no blame-shifting, just good communication and effective action.

6. People in Middle Tennessee cling to their bibles and guns. Looting makes good video, but it has not become a popular leisure-time activity here, because it is publicly frowned upon, and is likely to be fatal.

5. There is no way to blame it on Karl Rove, Halliburton or Dick Cheney.

4. CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS and CNN did not inform the hacks and opportunists in Washington of events in Tennessee, thus depriving them of timely photo opportunities against a backdrop of hapless victims and tireless aid workers. No one watches MSNBC, so coverage there would not have mattered, anyway.

3. There was no way to blame it on Wall Street speculators, Big Oil or Big Tobacco.

2. It’s hard for the race mongers to claim racism, since people of all races got wet, and people of all races were immediately helping each other, without waiting for government permission or coercion.

1. There was no way to blame it on George W. Bush.

It doesn’t matter much to locals to notice the way we were ignored by a crisis-hungry White House and its propaganda engine, but it certainly tells us who our friends are – and aren’t — and how we stand in the eyes of the current establishment.

It’s not hard to imagine. Some primped New York twit from a network morning show in fashionable raingear, trailing a camera crew and makeup artist, walks up to a Bubba dragging soggy, stinking carpet out the front door of his mobile, or searching for his lost goats in the trees, or carrying a dripping family photo album. The twit sticks a microphone in his face, and asks, “So, how do you feel? Don’t you wish Bush and Cheney had done more to prevent this?”

Considering the most reasonable reaction to the kind of stupid question said twits are capable of, maybe it’s just as well. There were enough casualties from the flood waters, without adding any New York twits to the body count. A jury of peers would acquit Bubba in five minutes, but the lawsuits would go on forever.

Stick your microphone where the sun don’t shine, New York twits. We’ll manage without you, somehow.

After all, we’ve managed up to now.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 8:42:36 AM
From: tonto1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
Kenneth, should we blame Obama and the democrats in control on the hill for every drunk driving fatality? We know that they have tougher laws abroad too...?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 8:42:58 AM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224755
 
GOP: WV congressman's ouster referendum on Obama


May 12, 3:20 AM (ET)

By VICKI SMITH


MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) - A West Virginia congressional seat that's been held by a Democrat for generations is now up for grabs after 14-term incumbent Rep. Alan Mollohan was swept out of office on a wave of voter unrest that an opponent called a referendum on President Barack Obama.

The congressman is the first U.S. House incumbent to be ousted this spring primary season amid widespread anti-incumbent sentiment. The same unrest helped end the 17-year career of Utah Republican Sen. Bob Bennett, who lost a GOP convention on Saturday.

State Sen. Michael Oliverio carried 56 percent of the vote to Mollohan's 44 percent Tuesday night after an aggressive campaign that questioned the incumbent's ethics and support for issues including federal health care reform.

The defeat sets up a general election battle this fall in which both Oliverio and Republican primary winner, former state GOP chairman David McKinley, will try to position themselves as fiscal conservatives and foes of big government. Both had made federal spending a key issue in the primary.

"We announced our campaign 100 days ago, and in 100 days' time our country has fallen one-third of a trillion dollars further into debt," Oliverio said. "We have to get the country's financial house in order, and that's what we're committed to doing."

But McKinley, also a former state legislator, said Mollohan's ouster is about more than spending.

"People just didn't like what was happening in Washington," he said. The outcome is a referendum on Obama's policies, from bailouts of banks and takeovers of car companies to health care reform.

"It's clear this is not the agenda they wanted," McKinley said of West Virginia voters. "This wasn't the change they envisioned."

Oliverio, a conservative Democrat, had run an aggressive campaign, portraying Mollohan as corrupt and out of touch. Conservative media rallied around the 46-year-old financial adviser from Morgantown, as did anti-abortion groups angry over Mollohan's support of health care legislation.

The anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List said it spent $78,000 on the 1st District race and made 80,000 prerecorded calls on Oliverio's behalf Monday and Tuesday. The results, it said, should serve as warning to other incumbents.

"We promised Rep. Mollohan and the other 'pro-life' Democrats that we would make their re-election incredibly painful if they voted 'yes' on the health care bill," said President Marjorie Dannenfelser.

Mollohan, 66, said his defeat was proof that negative campaigns still work and called Oliverio's attacks "totally spurious and totally false."

But he acknowledged that he faced a "strong headwind" of voter discontent.

"It's true there is definitely a wave out there, a national mood and wave," Mollohan said after conceding defeat.

Midterm congressional elections are referendums, he said, "and if people are not feeling good about what's happening, if they don't agree with legislation or they just are concerned, they express it."

Mollohan stood by his record, insisting most of his constituents wanted the health care reform he has championed for years. He said he worked hard to ensure no public funds would be used for abortions and is confident the legislation achieved that, even though the National Right to Life Political Action Committee endorsed Oliverio.

"I feel good in my heart tonight," said Mollohan, standing with his wife and son. "We feel like we have worked really hard and have done many, many good things in the district."

Mollohan was first elected in 1982. He ran a relatively lethargic campaign until recent weeks, when he began airing TV ads calling Oliverio dangerously conservative and bad for business and labor.

Mollohan dismissed Oliverio's attacks as a smear campaign that began four years ago when he refused to let House Republicans undermine ethics committee rules to try to protect former Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas.

In 2006, the Justice Department opened an investigation of Mollohan that is believed to have focused on the rapid growth of his personal wealth and his pattern of securing federal funds for nonprofits he helped create.

The investigation ended in January without comment or charges - which Mollohan considered vindication.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 8:57:40 AM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
oh bummer! Since when do you not only believe but also quote what a big oil man says? Does that make it fact? There is a large matter of liability at stake which will distort statements, isn't there? Doesn't the buck stop at the white house of the current administration. Shouldn't bamah know all the things that you know about cheney and his cohorts and their secret policies? Shouldn't he have corrected them as soon as he took office? How long is he in office now?

Don't worry! Be happy on the road to serfdom!

the hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of hope



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 9:42:19 AM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224755
 
You argument seems to be

1 There are other places with (undefined) more stringent safeguards.

2 An accident happened here.

Therefore
3 Bush and Cheney are to blame.

Do you recognize some gaps in your argument?

I'll help you out. Do you have evidence that Bush and Cheney lowered the requirements for safeguards? Do you have evidence that these undefined more stringent safeguards would have done any good?

Well you certainly haven't posted any.

Can you even say what these safeguards are?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (83807)5/12/2010 9:47:14 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224755
 
"It turns out, by the way, that oil rigs today generally don't cause spills,"
"They are technologically very advanced."
-Barack Obama 4/2/10