SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (79741)5/14/2010 12:00:12 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
What would climate bill accomplish? Probably nothing.

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
05/13/10 9:56 AM EDT

Climate scientist Chip Knappenberger takes as his baseline the IPCC’s assumptions about temperature change due to Global Warming under a “Business As Usual” (BAU) scenario. For the sake of argument, he gives these numbers the benefit of the doubt, despite many questions about their accuracy.

From there, his calculations lead him to question whether a massive, economy-killing Global Warming bill like that proposed by Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., will even do anything to save the planet:


<<< The global temperature “savings” of the Kerry-Lieberman bill is astoundingly small—0.043°C (0.077°F) by 2050 and 0.111°C (0.200°F) by 2100. In other words, by century’s end, reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 83% will only result in global temperatures being one-fifth of one degree Fahrenheit less than they would otherwise be. That is a scientifically meaningless reduction….

[T]he impacts on future sea level rise projections are equally insignificant. Instead of a projected sea level rise of 15.1cm by 2050, the Kerry-Lieberman bill produces a rise of 14.9cm. By 2100, the BAU projected rise is 37.1cm and the Kerry-Lieberman rise is 36.0cm. A century’s end sea level rise savings of 1.1cm, or 0.43 inches. Too small to be of consequence. >>>


I recommend you read the whole post, which includes helpful graphs.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com