Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (566250)	5/14/2010 6:26:28 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577025

Wrong. "....instead you accused CJ of being wrong and lying. This is becoming a pattern......." I didn't accuse him of being wrong about the topic. CJ, however, did lie about me. My comment was directly referenced to the article Al posted. I said, according to the article (Al posted) both men denied having sex. In the article (Al posted) that was accurate and there was no further information until later. I was not lying about that, making CJs allegation a lie. But you were wrong. Nonetheless it was Al you accused of being a hypocrite, not CJ. My mistake. "It makes you look like the REAL dirtbag." No it doesn't, it is an attempt to do that, but we are all familiar with CJ's 'maneuvering' now. No one believes him. You and your disgusting little tribe of codependants can chortle about how it looks that way but even you know better, so no 'appearance' was genuinely created... other than the appearance of your silly little clown puppets dancing about making noises, which is not cute. It's your life, do as you wish I don't care but I don't have to watch grown men acting like miscreant imbeciles if I don't want to, which is why I put CJ on ignor. What are you ranting about now? Clarity is not your strong suit, is it?