SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: coug who wrote (80126)5/15/2010 3:33:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
All Hands on Deck
_______________________________________________________________

What Can You Do About the Gulf Oil Spill?
by Riki Ott
Published on Friday, May 14, 2010 by YES! Magazine

In the southern marshes and swamplands of Louisiana, local fishermen refer to BP as "Bayou Polluter" - and that was before the April 20 blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig operated by the oil giant. Fishermen say BP spills oil every year and they point out marshes still dead from dispersants that were sprayed there.

If President Obama has a say, BP will stand for "Better Pay" for the environmental and economic damages that will stem from the uncontrolled leak, likely at 20,000 barrels (840,000 gallons) a day, according to satellite imagery.

In the Exxon Valdez spill, people counted on the oil company to respond to and clean up the mess, and we counted on Congress and the legal system to hold the oil industry accountable for damages to the environment and local communities and economies. In hindsight, these turned out to be bad ideas-for reasons I've recounted in two books. Exxon dodged penalties through long court battles, systematically underestimating the scope of the spill, and leveraging the costs of clean-up to avoid fines and penalties. The company even wrote off the cost of clean-up as a business expense. Where's the deterrent in that?

Let's not make the same mistakes again. BP's leak from the rig blowout is so catastrophic and so out of control that the situation calls for all hands on deck-for immediate response, for dealing with the spill's long-term ramifications, and for preventing another disaster of this magnitude.

What can impacted communities, governments, and states do to monitor, cleanup, and restore marshes and beaches?

Start up Shoreline Cleanup Assessment Teams to monitor and map the extent of surface oil on beaches and in marshes. In a best-case scenario, teams should include representatives of local nonprofit organizations along with the usual local, state, and federal government officials and industry representatives. Including citizens at this level builds public confidence and trust in the program and information.

Start up baseline monitoring programs to map the extent of dissolved oil beneath the water's surface. This subsurface pollution threatens shellfish, fish, and other sea life. A standard way of monitoring coastal pollution is to lower caged shellfish to various depths, then periodically analyze samples in a lab. Oyster Watch programs could involve a partnership with local governments and local chapters of active nonprofits to also build goodwill and self-sufficiency.

Adopt a position of "No More Harm" and issue emergency orders banning the use of chemical dispersants (and all products with carrier solvents) in near-shore and marsh habitats. Chemicals that dissolve and disperse crude oil typically contain solvents, which means they are inherently toxic to sea life, especially in shallow areas where the toxic impact of the chemical and the dispersed oil cannot be rapidly diluted.

Coordinate efforts to find and use nonharmful methods such as hair mats or peat moss to recover oil from sensitive marsh and beach habitats. Establish Mycelium Response Teams in communities to help with composting natural cleanup products. These are important alternatives to synthetic booms, which need to be cleaned (with solvents) or discarded (tons of contaminated absorbent materials are stored in landfills or burned in incinerators), creating secondary pollution problems.

What can local impacted communities, governments, and states do to protect public health and worker safety?

Establish an oil-pollution advisory system to warn recreational users of potential pollution hazards on public beaches-perhaps adopting the flag system already in place to warn people of weather or swimming hazards.

Establish teams of doctors trained in occupational and environmental medicine to treat people with symptoms of overexposure to crude oil, including respiratory problems, dizziness, nausea, headaches, and even cold and flu-like symptoms-which symptoms from chemical-induced illnesses mimic.

Increase protection for spill responders. Ask Congress to remove the exemption for reporting colds and flu under the OSHA regulations. This exemption effectively allows companies to bypass reporting symptoms of chemical-induced illnesses-exactly what OSHA purports to protect workers from.

Take immediate steps to train people to facilitate Peer Listening Circles to mitigate social and individual disaster trauma.

Establish seafood monitoring programs to ensure that commercial catch is free of contamination from oil and dispersants.

What can people do to help? Lots.

The Obama Administration, Congress, and the states need to hear from all of us.

Pressure state leaders and congressional delegates to support the Big Oil Bailout Prevention Act to increase the cap on liability from $75 million to $10 billion minimum, retroactive to the BP Gulf disaster. Following the Exxon Valdez oil spill, Exxon eventually paid a total of about $1.5 billion to injured parties, which boiled down to about 7 to 10 percent of actual individual losses in Prince William Sound-and the payment came 20 years too late to help people through the immediate debt and cash-flow crises caused by the spill.

Hold President Obama to his promise to make BP pay for damages from its catastrophe. Ask Obama and Congress to withhold all future oil and gas leases-onshore and offshore-until BP negotiates a settlement with injured parties instead of litigating or relying on the Oil Liability Trust Fund. Litigants in the Exxon Valdez case know full well that the U.S. legal system is incapable of holding large corporations accountable for the full monetary damages from large-scale industrial accidents. While $10 billion is chump change for oil giants like BP, it is survival for injured fishermen, local restaurants, resorts, and local communities, among others.

Pressure state officials and Congress to establish a Gulf Regional Citizens Advisory Council, modeled after the Prince William Sound council and mandated by the Oil Pollution Act, prior to any further oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Mexico.

Contact Congress and the Obama administration to demand that no more waivers or exemptions to our environmental protection laws be granted for oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Mexico-or anywhere else in the United States. Further, demand full public disclosure of a complete list of existing waivers and exemptions from our regulations and laws (including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Superfund, and Safe Drinking Water Act, among others) that have been granted to this industry. Exceptions to the rule lead to industrial accidents like mine collapse, coal ash spills, and the situation in the Gulf.

Demand a stay on future oil and gas permitting pending a full cost accounting of our nation's oil dependency. Failure to recognize and account for "externalities" such as the costs of poisoned drinking water, degraded air quality and public health, asthma in children, the global climate crisis, and the tremendous environmental cost of the spill in the Gulf will only lead to continued blind dependency on fossil fuels.

Lastly, start acting like the sovereign people that we are. Insist that people rule, not property, and that the people's voice counts more than business in deciding our future energy choices. Join Move to Amend and other groups in pushing for curbs on corporate power.

*Riki Ott, PhD, wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Riki has written two books on the Exxon Valdez oil spill's impacts on people, communities, and wildlife, including the recently released Not One Drop: Betrayal and Courage in the Wake of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A marine toxicologist and former fisherma’am, she is a national spokesperson with Move To Amend, a grassroots campaign advocating constitutional amendments to restrict corporate power.



To: coug who wrote (80126)5/16/2010 8:12:40 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Giant Plumes of Oil Found Forming Under Gulf of Mexico
_______________________________________________________________

By JUSTIN GILLIS
The New York Times
May 15, 2010

Scientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick in spots. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given.

“There’s a shocking amount of oil in the deep water, relative to what you see in the surface water,” said Samantha Joye, a researcher at the University of Georgia who is involved in one of the first scientific missions to gather details about what is happening in the gulf. “There’s a tremendous amount of oil in multiple layers, three or four or five layers deep in the water column.”

The plumes are depleting the oxygen dissolved in the gulf, worrying scientists, who fear that the oxygen level could eventually fall so low as to kill off much of the sea life near the plumes.

Dr. Joye said the oxygen had already dropped 30 percent near some of the plumes in the month that the broken oil well had been flowing. “If you keep those kinds of rates up, you could draw the oxygen down to very low levels that are dangerous to animals in a couple of months,” she said Saturday. “That is alarming.”

The plumes were discovered by scientists from several universities working aboard the research vessel Pelican, which sailed from Cocodrie, La., on May 3 and has gathered extensive samples and information about the disaster in the gulf.

Scientists studying video of the gushing oil well have tentatively calculated that it could be flowing at a rate of 25,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil a day. The latter figure would be 3.4 million gallons a day. But the government, working from satellite images of the ocean surface, has calculated a flow rate of only 5,000 barrels a day.

BP has resisted entreaties from scientists that they be allowed to use sophisticated instruments at the ocean floor that would give a far more accurate picture of how much oil is really gushing from the well.

“The answer is no to that,” a BP spokesman, Tom Mueller, said on Saturday. “We’re not going to take any extra efforts now to calculate flow there at this point. It’s not relevant to the response effort, and it might even detract from the response effort.”

The undersea plumes may go a long way toward explaining the discrepancy between the flow estimates, suggesting that much of the oil emerging from the well could be lingering far below the sea surface.

The scientists on the Pelican mission, which is backed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the federal agency that monitors the health of the oceans, are not certain why that would be. They say they suspect the heavy use of chemical dispersants, which BP has injected into the stream of oil emerging from the well, may have broken the oil up into droplets too small to rise rapidly.

BP said Saturday at a briefing in Robert, La., that it had resumed undersea application of dispersants, after winning Environmental Protection Agency approval the day before.

“It appears that the application of the subsea dispersant is actually working,” Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer for exploration and production, said Saturday. “The oil in the immediate vicinity of the well and the ships and rigs working in the area is diminished from previous observations.”

Many scientists had hoped the dispersants would cause oil droplets to spread so widely that they would be less of a problem in any one place. If it turns out that is not happening, the strategy could come under greater scrutiny. Dispersants have never been used in an oil leak of this size a mile under the ocean, and their effects at such depth are largely unknown.

Much about the situation below the water is unclear, and the scientists stressed that their results were preliminary. After the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon, they altered a previously scheduled research mission to focus on the effects of the leak.

Interviewed on Saturday by satellite phone, one researcher aboard the Pelican, Vernon Asper of the University of Southern Mississippi, said the shallowest oil plume the group had detected was at about 2,300 feet, while the deepest was near the seafloor at about 4,200 feet.

“We’re trying to map them, but it’s a tedious process,” Dr. Asper said. “Right now it looks like the oil is moving southwest, not all that rapidly.”

He said they had taken water samples from areas that oil had not yet reached, and would compare those with later samples to judge the impact on the chemistry and biology of the ocean.

While they have detected the plumes and their effects with several types of instruments, the researchers are still not sure about their density, nor do they have a very good fix on the dimensions.

Given their size, the plumes cannot possibly be made of pure oil, but more likely consist of fine droplets of oil suspended in a far greater quantity of water, Dr. Joye said. She added that in places, at least, the plumes might be the consistency of a thin salad dressing.

Dr. Joye is serving as a coordinator of the mission from her laboratory in Athens, Ga. Researchers from the University of Mississippi and the University of Southern Mississippi are aboard the boat taking samples and running instruments.

Dr. Joye said the findings about declining oxygen levels were especially worrisome, since oxygen is so slow to move from the surface of the ocean to the bottom. She suspects that oil-eating bacteria are consuming the oxygen at a feverish clip as they work to break down the plumes.

While the oxygen depletion so far is not enough to kill off sea life, the possibility looms that oxygen levels could fall so low as to create large dead zones, especially at the seafloor. “That’s the big worry,” said Ray Highsmith, head of the Mississippi center that sponsored the mission, known as the National Institute for Undersea Science and Technology.

The Pelican mission is due to end Sunday, but the scientists are seeking federal support to resume it soon.

“This is a new type of event, and it’s critically important that we really understand it, because of the incredible number of oil platforms not only in the Gulf of Mexico but all over the world now,” Dr. Highsmith said. “We need to know what these events are like, and what their outcomes can be, and what can be done to deal with the next one.”

-Shaila Dewan contributed reporting from Robert, La.



To: coug who wrote (80126)5/17/2010 8:30:48 PM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Massive underwater oil cloud may destroy life in Gulf of Mexico

prisonplanet.com



To: coug who wrote (80126)5/17/2010 9:27:54 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
60 Minutes: Despite damaged blowout preventer, BP cut corners immediately before explosion

dailykos.com



To: coug who wrote (80126)5/18/2010 4:41:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
BP's Haste Lays Waste to Gulf Waters

commondreams.org



To: coug who wrote (80126)5/18/2010 5:11:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
Slippery Talk: Obama Has Learned Nothing from the BP Blowout

thiscantbehappening.net

by Dave LIndorff

Created 05/17/2010 - 10:58

President Obama claims to have learned a lesson from the disastrous blowout of British Petroleum drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico: a “cozy relationship” between the agency that regulates oil drilling, the Minerals Management Service, and the oil industry, he charges, allowed companies to drill in vulnerable offshore areas without properly assessing the risks to the ocean and its ecology.

He’s only just figuring this out?

Hell, we already had an example of the problem of “cozy relations” between regulators and industry. The bank crisis that produced the current recession was the financial equivalent of a much bigger oil-well blowout than the Deepwater Horizon rig. It was a catastrophic blowout of the entire global financial system--and it was precipitated by an identical “cozy relationship” between US bank regulators and the banking industry that they were supposed to be regulating. That financial blowout has left almost one in five US workers without jobs now for two years, with no end in sight. And like the giant hidden plumes of oil spreading out in deep layers of the Gulf and heading for the Gulf Stream, it also spread to Europe and beyond, hobbling economies around the world.

But that’s only the beginning. If a “cozy relationship” between regulators and the industries they are supposed to be regulating is a bad thing when it comes to the oil industry, is this because the oil industry is particularly evil and corrupt or is it the principle of the thing? Of course not. As corrupt as the oil industry is, no one could say that industry is unique in its efforts to skirt rules, buy legislators, manipulate prices or poison the public.

Corruption permeates US regulatory apparatus

So why is the president only talking about this one “cozy relationship”?

What about the drug industry and the Food and Drug Administration?

What about hedgefunds and other off-exchange trading platforms and the SEC?

What about the airline industry and the Federal Aviation Administration?

What about the media and telecom industries and the Federal Communications Commission?

What about agribusiness and the Agriculture Department?

What about the National Transportation Safety Administration and Environmental Protection Industry and the auto industry?

What about the chemical industry (and the oil companies!) and the EPA?

What about the medical-industrial complex and the Department of Health and Human Services or the FDA or the Medicare administration?

What about the nuclear industry and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission?

What about military contractors and the Department of Defense? (sic)

The list of federal regulators that have “cozy relationships” with the industries they are supposed to be riding herd on goes on and on.

Clearly this president isn’t serious in condemning the “cozy relationship” between this one industry, the oil companies, and its regulator, the MMS, which he now says he wants to have broken up into two parts--a regulatory arm and a revenue-collection arm.

If he were, he’d be breaking up most of the federal agencies and departments into two parts--one a hard-nosed regulator to protect the public, the environment and the economy, and one, if needed, that might promote the activities and development of a particular industry.

He’s not even suggesting doing that, and in fact, has not suggested that there is any problem at all with the regulation of the rest of the nation’s industries, although all the available evidence is dramatically to the contrary: that the whole regulatory apparatus of the United States government has been hijacked by corporate interests.

We’ve had the equivalent of huge wild-well gushers in most industries just in the past two years, including: massive outbreaks of contamination in the nation’s food supply, the bailiwick of the USDA; a wholesale failure of the auto industry to produce fuel-efficient vehicles, not to mention a deluge of safety problems (EPA and NTSA); monopoly practices and price gouging in the media/telecom industry (FCC); continuing concentration in the banking industry and a continuing refusal to address the bankruptcy crisis (Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Comptroller’s Office, Treasury Dept.); ongoing destruction of croplands and old-growth forests (Interior Department and Bureau of Land Management), and corrupt bidding processes for military weapons. And that’s hardly the complete list.

If the president were honest and not just a charlatan, and if he were half the scholar he is portrayed as, he would be saying that this thoroughly predictable (and predicted) disaster in the Gulf of Mexico was the last straw, and that he would begin a wholesale assault on the subversion of the nation’s industry regulation regime.

Instead, he stands exposed as just another political charlatan. His call for “reform” of the Minerals Management Service is simply an attempt by yet another slick politician, when faced by popular anger over one industry’s appalling behavior, to pretend to be doing something.

We can predict that it will all be for show, and that once the BP well is finally shut down and the national attention has shifted to the next sports or movie star scandal, the oil industry will be allowed to go back to business as usual, putting coastal wetlands and the Arctic Ocean further at risk of even greater despoliation, all so that American car companies can continue to crank out gas-guzzling SUVs and power plants can continue to pour massive quantities of carbon into the atmosphere unimpeded.