SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (5218)5/16/2010 5:50:09 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
I only read the first few lines of your long copy and paste posts and noticed that blunder right away. I thought no, surely the guy wouldn't get someone's name confused in the introduction to an honorarium, would he? But yes, he would. And being a "freethinker" he was too ignorant to check his own speech.

You didn't notice it, just as "freethinker" Greeley and the estimated half dozen other "freethinkers" that had read the piece didn't.

Hilarious.



To: Solon who wrote (5218)5/16/2010 6:06:53 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
DISCRIMINATION WITH A DEGREE OF SEPARATION....

There was an interesting story near Boston this week, involving a young child facing discrimination because of his parents' sexual orientation.

A Roman Catholic school in Massachusetts has withdrawn its acceptance of an 8-year-old boy with lesbian parents, saying their relationship was "in discord" with church teachings, according to one of the boys' mothers.

It's at least the second time in recent months that students have not been allowed to attend a U.S. Catholic school because of their parents' sexual orientation, with the other instance occurring in Colorado.

The Massachusetts woman, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of concerns about the effect of publicity on her son, said she planned to send the boy to third grade at St. Paul Elementary School in Hingham in the fall. But she said she learned her son's acceptance was rescinded during a conference call Monday with Principal Cynthia Duggan and the parish priest, the Rev. James Rafferty.

"I'm accustomed to discrimination, I suppose, at my age and my experience as a gay woman," the mother said. "But I didn't expect it against my child."

According to the mother, the priest doesn't have a problem with the 8-year-old boy, but the school doesn't want him because the church disapproves of the child's parents being lesbians, which is "in discord with the teachings of the Catholic Church." That the lesbian couple is Christian, and wants their boy to get an education that emphasizes Christian values, didn't matter. The parents were also willing to pay the tuition costs. The school, after already accepting the child, changed its mind anyway.

When the story started generating negative publicity for the Boston Archdiocese, it announced its intention to help the family find a different Catholic school for the young boy. We'll see how that goes.

But after hearing this story the other day, I realized my first reaction was probably off-base. My instinct was to be outraged by the Catholic school's callousness. Why would a church turn its back on a child? Why would a Christian school refuse entry to an 8 year old based on what his parents do in their bedroom?

Upon further reflection, though, it occurred to me that the elementary school can do as it pleases. It's part of a private religious ministry that can hate whomever it wants to hate. It's cruel, but the First Amendment protects churches and their schools that want to discriminate for all kinds of reasons.

But, and this is key, don't even think about asking taxpayers to subsidize this. A private religious school wants to reject children based on their parents' sexual orientation? Fine. It's deeply offensive, but fine. But this becomes far more problematic when that same private religious school says, "And we want voucher money, too."

—Steve Benen 10:45 AM

washingtonmonthly.com